Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1   Report Post  
Old April 17th 08, 10:24 AM posted to rec.radio.amateur.antenna
JN JN is offline
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Mar 2008
Posts: 21
Default Linear decoupling traps

Unfortunately, a 2:1 ratio seems difficult to
achieve.
--
73, Cecil http://www.w5dxp.com


In real life, at least in my case the stub will be made of twin-lead type
material which shortens it abt 30%.
If the shortening effect at lower frequency due to the inductive loading of
stub is less, then it would be possible.
Going one step further you could easily add another band to the design as
parallell dipole for 17m using unused parts of
douple-line. That should have litle interaction to the original double band
antenna.
http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3016/...fd3b1e6c_o.jpg


As Jim K7JEB verified, the total half length is not 20m but 15,5m due to the
loading effect of the stub.
The real stub length is 1/4 WL at higher frequency respecting the velocity
factor of material used.


73 Jouko OH5RM


Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Effectiveness of decoupling radials Owen Duffy Antenna 14 May 2nd 07 10:22 PM
Capacitor Traps [email protected] Shortwave 0 January 15th 06 07:47 PM
Decoupling coax transmission line Charlie Antenna 3 December 31st 04 04:27 PM
WTB : Beam Traps NA1VT Homebrew 0 October 16th 04 03:14 PM
WTB : Beam Traps NA1VT General 0 October 16th 04 03:14 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:09 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017