Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#29
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sat, 19 Apr 2008 01:56:31 -0700, Roy Lewallen
wrote: Buck wrote: On Fri, 18 Apr 2008 11:11:05 -0700, Roy Lewallen wrote: Buck wrote: . . . I don't remember the dimensions, but I remember that in the instructions, EZNEC could not make accurate measurements with parallel wires within a certain distance like 8-10 inches. (someone correct me here.) . . . That's not correct. However, it is essential to align the segment junctions so they're directly across from each other when modeling closely spaced parallel wires. Roy Lewallen, W7EL Is this true for 3 as behind a version or two. This is true for every NEC-based program, which includes all versions of EZNEC. See "Parallel Wires" in the EZNEC manual index. Roy Lewallen, W7EL You wrote the program, so I am not arguing with you, I will check it out again. I sure feel I remember that being a restriction. Funny thing is, that I haven't set learning the program to a higher priority since I didn't think it would model what I want to experiment with, which is parallel wires/poles. I'll have to look into that more. Thanks for the heads up. BTW what is the upgrade cost for 4.0 and 5.0 from 3.0? Thanks Buck n4PGW -- 73 for now Buck, N4PGW www.lumpuckeroo.com "Small - broadband - efficient: pick any two." |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Effectiveness of decoupling radials | Antenna | |||
Capacitor Traps | Shortwave | |||
Decoupling coax transmission line | Antenna | |||
WTB : Beam Traps | Homebrew | |||
WTB : Beam Traps | General |