Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sat, 13 Mar 2004 15:53:34 -0600, Cecil Moore
wrote: Richard Harrison wrote: Cecil has argued that the high impedance at the open end of a shorted 1/4-wave stub does not inhibit current into the stub. The reflection point is at the short, not at the high impedance point back 1/4-wave from the short. That sounds reasonable to me, but I wonder if it makes any difference. Cecil wrote: Only to those who think the stub is a physical open-circuit at the mouth of the stub and therefore, no current flows in the stub. :-) In a stub constructed of lossless material the only current that flows in the stub is that required to bring it up to the steady statecondition. In a practical stub with attenuation current flows into the stub continually, but only that sufficient to compensate for the loss due to attenuation to retain it's steady state condition. Walt, W2DU |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Complex Z0 [Corrected] | Antenna | |||
Derivation of the Reflection Coefficient? | Antenna | |||
The Cecilian Gambit, a variation on the Galilean Defense revisited | Antenna |