LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #11   Report Post  
Old March 13th 04, 10:08 PM
Walter Maxwell
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Sat, 13 Mar 2004 15:53:34 -0600, Cecil Moore
wrote:

Richard Harrison wrote:
Cecil has argued that the high impedance at the open end of a shorted
1/4-wave stub does not inhibit current into the stub. The reflection
point is at the short, not at the high impedance point back 1/4-wave
from the short. That sounds reasonable to me, but I wonder if it makes
any difference.

Cecil wrote:
Only to those who think the stub is a physical open-circuit at the
mouth of the stub and therefore, no current flows in the stub. :-)


In a stub constructed of lossless material the only current that flows in the
stub is that required to bring it up to the steady statecondition.

In a practical stub with attenuation current flows into the stub continually,
but only that sufficient to compensate for the loss due to attenuation to retain
it's steady state condition.

Walt, W2DU
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Complex Z0 [Corrected] pez Antenna 41 September 11th 03 05:00 PM
Derivation of the Reflection Coefficient? Dr. Slick Antenna 104 September 6th 03 02:27 AM
The Cecilian Gambit, a variation on the Galilean Defense revisited Richard Clark Antenna 11 July 24th 03 07:30 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:08 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017