Could all of you experts who can count the angels on the head of a pin but
obviously cannot read English, please take this to a relevant newsgroup?
This is not an antenna issue, and doesn't belong anywhere in the same zip
code with rec.radio.amateur. ANTENNA.

If your egos just absolutely demand publication, perhaps a new newsgroup
with the name "dummy load" would suffice. and any of you could start it.
Personally, I'll be very careful to avoid it.

W4ZCB

Sorry if the posts offended you, Harold, but I'm flabbergasted that Richard had
the gall to post his denigration of my paper in the newsgroup. With common sense
he should have known to send his comments to me, not to broadcast them. I felt I
had no choice but to put my rebuttal in the same place to defend myself from
from his unwarrented comments.

Walt, W2DU

Walter Maxwell wrote:
Sorry if the posts offended you, Harold, but I'm flabbergasted that
Richard had the gall to post his denigration of my paper in the
newsgroup.

I'd simply like to know -
1 - Who the **** are you?
2 - What the **** is chapter 19A?
3 - Why the **** have you wasted so much
space on this antenna newsgroup with your
post asking for reviews and then getting
your panties wadded when someone "denigrates"
your stupid ass paper?

**** you and your ****ing chapters.


Craig 'Lumpy' Lemke

www.n0eq.com

"Lumpy" wrote in message
...
Walter Maxwell wrote:
Sorry if the posts offended you, Harold, but I'm flabbergasted that
Richard had the gall to post his denigration of my paper in the
newsgroup.

I'd simply like to know -
SNIP

Craig 'Lumpy' Lemke

www.n0eq.com


If you did a google on the author's name and perhaps the word "reflections",
you might get the answers to your questions. You might also discover that
it is related to antenna systems.

On Jun 22, 6:12 pm, "Wayne" wrote:
"Lumpy" wrote in message

... Walter Maxwell wrote:
Sorry if the posts offended you, Harold, but I'm flabbergasted that
Richard had the gall to post his denigration of my paper in the
newsgroup.

I'd simply like to know -
SNIP

Craig 'Lumpy' Lemke

www.n0eq.com

If you did a google on the author's name and perhaps the word "reflections",
you might get the answers to your questions. You might also discover that
it is related to antenna systems.
Yup. That is correct. this is the third time he has published this
book in the hope of finally getting it right
but apparently it is discredited before publishing by the antenna
group! expert

"Art Unwin" wrote in message
...
On Jun 22, 6:12 pm, "Wayne" wrote:
"Lumpy" wrote in message

... Walter Maxwell wrote:
Sorry if the posts offended you, Harold, but I'm flabbergasted that
Richard had the gall to post his denigration of my paper in the
newsgroup.

I'd simply like to know -
SNIP

Craig 'Lumpy' Lemke

www.n0eq.com

If you did a google on the author's name and perhaps the word "reflections",
you might get the answers to your questions. You might also discover that
it is related to antenna systems.
Yup. That is correct. this is the third time he has published this
book in the hope of finally getting it right
but apparently it is discredited before publishing by the antenna
group! expert

Art, I wish you'd get your facts straight before you post. To set the record
straight the 1st edition of Reflections sold out at 10,000 copies, the 2nd
edition at 3,000 copies, while the 3rd edition hasn't been published yet.
Nothing about anything pertaining to Reflections has been discredited. Who told
you it has been? If you'd like to look at a few of the chapters go to my web
page at www.w2du.com.

Walt

On Jun 22, 6:52 pm, "Walter Maxwell" wrote:
"Art Unwin" wrote in message

...



On Jun 22, 6:12 pm, "Wayne" wrote:
"Lumpy" wrote in message

... Walter Maxwell wrote:
Sorry if the posts offended you, Harold, but I'm flabbergasted that
Richard had the gall to post his denigration of my paper in the
newsgroup.

I'd simply like to know -
SNIP

Craig 'Lumpy' Lemke

www.n0eq.com

If you did a google on the author's name and perhaps the word "reflections",
you might get the answers to your questions. You might also discover that
it is related to antenna systems.
Yup. That is correct. this is the third time he has published this
book in the hope of finally getting it right
but apparently it is discredited before publishing by the antenna
group! expert

Art, I wish you'd get your facts straight before you post. To set the record
straight the 1st edition of Reflections sold out at 10,000 copies, the 2nd
edition at 3,000 copies, while the 3rd edition hasn't been published yet.
Nothing about anything pertaining to Reflections has been discredited. Who told
you it has been? If you'd like to look at a few of the chapters go to my web
page atwww.w2du.com.

Walt

I have your book and I don't think much of it. With respect to facts
Richard lied about the mathematical connection between Gauss and
Maxwell. Most of you believed him without checking the facts and I was
dissed. Then a doctor Davis came aboard and showed you where you were
wrong but now everybody was committed and dissed him also. Yes, I was
discredited on a lie , which he admitted to after I was victimised by
all. Now he has discredited your book and you on the basis of what you
call" lies". I got no apologies and neither did Dr Davis
and the lie you were part of goes on to this day. You ask for facts
you got them and they are still in the archives. You are calling the
kettle black. Get back to antennas and stop promoting yourself and
your third book which you claim is now right.You at least got some
reasons as to why your postings were dissed, for my troubles I got
nothing.It is evident that the majority of this newsgro0up do not like
the move under way to change the subject of antennas so why not try to
get along with your fellow posters
or move on?

Wayne wrote:

If you did a google on the author's name and perhaps the word
"reflections", you might get the answers to your questions. You
might also discover that it is related to antenna systems.

I don't care who the author thinks he is.

But if he posts to a public forum, asking for critique,
then getting ****ed because someone
"had the gall to post his denigration of my paper"
then I guess he's just not as important as he,
and you, think he is.


Craig 'Lumpy' Lemke

www.n0eq.com

"Walter Maxwell" wrote in message
...
Sorry if the posts offended you, Harold, but I'm flabbergasted that
Richard had
the gall to post his denigration of my paper in the newsgroup. With common
sense
he should have known to send his comments to me, not to broadcast them. I
felt I
had no choice but to put my rebuttal in the same place to defend myself
from
from his unwarrented comments.

Walt, W2DU

Walter, I can delete posts as well as the next guy, the point is, I
shouldn't need to. You started the whole thing by giving Cecil the push.
You, he, and several other off topic posters have just close to ruined a
newsgroup that used to be a useful source of information concerning
antennas. Then there's always the rebuttal to the rebuttal ad nausium. I
know that you are as convinced as Bruene is of the sanctity of your
convictions, you should realize, that the vast majority of the rest of us
don't really care which of you are right. We've successfully managed to load
our rigs, work the world, and obtain some happiness without the knowledge
you insist on imparting to us. Please don't common sense Richard. With
common sense, you wouldn't have sent 19A to Cecil in the first place but
your ego got in the way.

I'll not entertain the group with any more of this, I would hope that you
take my earlier post to heart and get off the newsgroup unless you have
something to post that contributes to the antenna sciences.

W4ZCB

On Jun 22, 1:43 pm, "Walter Maxwell" wrote:
Sorry if the posts offended you, Harold, but I'm flabbergasted that Richard had
the gall to post his denigration of my paper in the newsgroup. With common sense
he should have known to send his comments to me, not to broadcast them. I felt I
had no choice but to put my rebuttal in the same place to defend myself from
from his unwarrented comments.

Walt, W2DU

Walter, when I placed my page unwinantennas.com/ on this antenna
discussion group
you and Richard had the gall to attack me and my work just for the fun
of destruction.
My page which is on antennas by the way shows the path why antennas
can be any
shape ,size or configuration including variable elevation as long as
it is in equilibrium.
You and Richard took on the quest to crush the idea before it was
discussed fully while Richard denied
that the Gaussin progression could not be equal to Maxwells law., A
position he reversed himself on
a few months later without apology after discussion was succesfully
dissed. You as a expert book author chose gthe path of insults without
one iota of professional comment.
Shame on both of you. This group is for the discussion of antennas and
when I brought forward the
equilibrium matter forward I beat you to the punch by providing the
mathematical aproach first.
Neither of you discussed seriously what I proferred so neither of you
could find fault with it and Richard was particarly vicious
with his attacks and not once finding an error. You both destroyed the
idea of antenna discussion and debate on this newsgroup
because you both over estimate your own abilities while taking the
pagth of destruction. I worked hard at what I did and then shared it
with my fellow amateurs so all could enjoy. You Walt and Richard
deserve each other, as they say,what you sow so may you reap!. Some
day hams will be allowed to discuss or debate antenna matters without
fear of attack from you and your followers who provide nothing of
technical content to the discussion searching only for a "me too"
aproach. Maybe now that both of you have shown your true colours or
GALL as you call it other true hams will come back and discuss
antennas without being pushed aside. Wiered how you both take offense
of a tactic that you have practiced for years upon others with some
relish and now complain of the tone of debate or critism that do not
match your own position of chief adjudicater on the subject of
radiation.
Art Unwin
Unwinantennas.com/