Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#15
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jun 23, 5:26 am, wrote:
On Jun 22, 8:48 pm, Art Unwin wrote: I have your book and I don't think much of it. With respect to facts Richard lied about the mathematical connection between Gauss and Maxwell. Most of you believed him without checking the facts and I was dissed. Then a doctor Davis came aboard and showed you where you were wrong but now everybody was committed and dissed him also. Yes, I was discredited on a lie , which he admitted to after I was victimised by all. Now he has discredited your book and you on the basis of what you call" lies". I got no apologies and neither did Dr Davis and the lie you were part of goes on to this day. You ask for facts you got them and they are still in the archives. You are calling the kettle black. Get back to antennas and stop promoting yourself and your third book which you claim is now right.You at least got some reasons as to why your postings were dissed, for my troubles I got nothing.It is evident that the majority of this newsgro0up do not like the move under way to change the subject of antennas so why not try to get along with your fellow posters or move on? By the way Walt you never came forward with the math to prove me wrong preffering a hatchet job instead of doing the math. Who cares.. You never gave any math to prove you are right. You never apologised either Who cares... It's not his job to suck up to whiny little twits.. on continuing what I am sure you knew was a lie because of your continual position of being superior in mathematics. I take this as an admission that your math may even be worse than mine is? :/ The position you took makes you an accessory in the lie because you knew it was a lie. But does he really care if it was or not? I suspect he had better things to worry about. You and your book have been dissed even if you can prove that Richard lied again This statement makes a lot of sense.. Almost as much as a page full of your blabber about equilibrium... but after the fact it is difficult to put things right. Instead of telling me to read your page why not read unwinantennas,com/ and the antenna group archives plus your own history on postings to refresh yourself on the "facts" that you wish for. I suspect he has little time to waste on sub par physics, and thus sub par antennas.. If you wish to make a rebuttal on the Gauss/Maxwell question be my guest and point out why you disagreed even in the face of Richard stating that he lied or are you committed to deeply now to reverse course instead of revealing the truth because it may hurt? Hey whiny one. I'm your huckleberry!!! I'm fairly bored at times. I can keep you busy until next Christmas if you really feel the need for discussion. I don't need any help from the others. I'll brown your food just from shear logic, and I won't even need no stinking math to do it. IE: I'd still like to hear about how a "static" particle can move, twist, and do the universal tango. And don't tell me that Gauss or equilibrium had anything to do with it. Doktor Davis.. Thats a laugh.. I remember everything about that adventure, and Art, *you* are the liar about that case. I've seen bumps on a persons ass that were more useful than Doktor Davis was to your case. Rather than answer a few pertinent questions posed to him, he did the duck and run, and has never been heard from since. Frankly, I kind of surprised at all the whining here. I don't think Walters post, or articles, or even books are out of the topic range of this group. And neither do I consider Richard Clarks posts either. For some reason they have a difference of opinion, and I think they should work it out to hopefully come to a conclusion. They can do it in private, or right here. I could care less. I haven't kept up with whatever led up to all this, so I'm not taking sides at all. Both may have valid points. Some of the comments seem a bit strong to me.. I find some of the comments to Walter as pretty tacky. To me, the posts *are* on topic. A heck of a lot closer than worries about the demise of Usenet, perpetual motion theories, tennis shoes, touchtone mikes, BIG BROTHER, etc, ad nausium.. Some of you all need to chill down and relax.. Go drink some vodka. That will help calm the nerves. Works for me.. I like it with grapefruit juice... But thats just my 29 cents worth. I understand your frausteration with antenna discussions but it is extremely hard to communicate the mathematical side of antennas for anybody who did not reach the high school graduation point, especially when you refuse to try to find out the meaning of equilibrium. I just finished a explanation of my antenna work on Eham so you have a chance to get up to speed on the subject rather than the spewing remarks that reflect your fraustration especially when other more experienced people are doing the same. Regards Art unwinantennas.com/ |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
REBUTTAL TO RX-340 COMMENTS BY PHIL | Shortwave | |||
REBUTTAL TO COMMENTS ON RX-340 BY DAVE ZANTOW | Shortwave | |||
Richard Pryor | Shortwave | |||
Richard Pryor 6925 USB | Shortwave | |||
Richard S. Garner---Any one know--- | Swap |