Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jun 24, 8:09*am, Ian Jackson
wrote: In message , Leon writes On 24 Jun, 03:18, Nick wrote: Hi All, * I keep reading on various websites and in various documents that HF verticals should have a "line isolator" (a choke/current balun) located near the antenna's feedpoint to prevent coax feedline re- radiation, disruption of the antenna's radiation pattern, sub-optimal vertical performance, and RFI in the shack. *My question is this: just how important is a choke balun when using a ground-mounted HF (for 40M) quarter-wave vertical antenna with 32 quarter-wave buried radials? *And if it is important, why wouldn't the choke be placed at the shack's input, so that the coax's outer shield could act as another radial? (I had always assumed that a vertical didn't need a balun at all, and that only dipoles used them. *Am I wrong about this?). Thanks! Nick A balun isn't required. Leon With this type of antenna, it certainly is not common practice to choke/isolate the coax, especially the coax braid can be grounded at the antenna feedpoint and in the shack, and possibly at some intermediate points along its length. It wouldn't do any harm to use one, but it probably wouldn't do very much. -- Ian- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Thanks for all the great responses guys! That is exactly what I had thought, that since the outer coax braid is grounded at the antenna, and at the shack, and (in my case) at the center with a lightening protector, then I just couldn't figure out why some antenna companies, such as reliable DX engineering with their DXE-VFCC H05-A Vertical Feedline Current Choke, strongly recommend such a line isolator for verticals. A direct quote from DX Engineering's Website: "2/5 kW Vertical Feedline Current Choke If your antenna SWR is already low and you wish to reduce feedline radiation and improve reception, a Feedline Current Choke is recommended. Adding a DX Engineering Feedline Current Choke at the base of a vertical antenna will substantially reduce unwanted feedline radiation (RFI), reducing the need for improved station grounding. When quarter-wave antennas are constructed over a good radial system, they have a feedpoint impedance of about 36 ohms. When they are constructed over less than a good radial-system there is a loss introduced into the feed system that adds to the 36-ohm figure. This improves the SWR but there is a loss in the efficiency of the antenna, signals transmitted and received have a higher take-off angle and often there is current introduced on to the feedline. With a ground-mounted quarter-wave vertical, regardless of the radial situation, but especially with poor radial systems, the feedline can become part of the radial system, causing RFI and poor antenna performance. By using a VFCC at the feedpoint, the feedline is effectively de-coupled from the antenna system, preventing interaction with the radial system, improving antenna efficiency. You may notice improved bandwidth as well. The Advantages of Using a VFCC: Prevents unwanted RFI by eliminating feedline current and radiation All power goes to the antenna, improving efficiency Reduces noise or unwanted signals picked-up by the feedline Overcome a less than optimal ground system Bracket isolates the VFCC case from ground for best de-coupling" -Nick |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
SWL Newbies : The Magnetic Long-Wire Antenna Balun - A Balun It Ain't | Shortwave | |||
Connect a 500 Ohm Antenna using Matching Transformer {Balun} ? -or- Antenna Pre-Selector ? | Shortwave | |||
HF LPF at antenna balun | Antenna | |||
The Long and Thin Vertical Loop Antenna. [ The Non-Resonance Vertical with a Difference ] | Shortwave | |||
ANTENNA BALUN ?? | Antenna |