Art Unwin wrote:

'
You know John, since America gives the 'right to bear arms' you would
think that the population would understand
...

Hmmm, got rid of my .357 ... just have an old, but in excellent shape,
..45 ... I am not sure, but I suspect this would stop a "home
invader"--even if you missed and hit him in the hand ...

...
Why is it so hard for Americans to understand that radiation is a
result of radial ejection of particles via a rejective rotary magnetic
field ?. Especially when particles in equilibrium is part and parcel
of Gaussian law which when extended to the same environment as the
Maxwellian law? Today we have total resistance to this evidence and
instead prefer to act like lemmings rather than face change.
Regards
Art
I haven't purchased a ARRL publication for years but I suspect they
are still talking of radiation as being wave form.

Hmmm ... I am still holding out a bit longer before calling the jury in
.... the new developments of being able to take "pictures" of light
waves/particles needs completely explored and given time for the
technology to improve/mature.

But, it certainly looks the absolute proof of what light "is", is a LOT
closer at hand. :-)

Regards,
JS

John Smith wrote:

...
But, it certainly looks the absolute proof of what light "is", is a LOT
closer at hand. :-)

Regards,
JS

Yanno, they have NOT even taken a "picture" of a HIGH POWER RF wave
though an excitable gas (MASER), yet. Let's see that first ...

Regards,
JS

On Jul 3, 7:43 pm, John Smith wrote:
Art Unwin wrote:
'
You know John, since America gives the 'right to bear arms' you would
think that the population would understand

...

Hmmm, got rid of my .357 ... just have an old, but in excellent shape,
.45 ... I am not sure, but I suspect this would stop a "home
invader"--even if you missed and hit him in the hand ...

...
Why is it so hard for Americans to understand that radiation is a
result of radial ejection of particles via a rejective rotary magnetic
field ?. Especially when particles in equilibrium is part and parcel
of Gaussian law which when extended to the same environment as the
Maxwellian law? Today we have total resistance to this evidence and
instead prefer to act like lemmings rather than face change.
Regards
Art
I haven't purchased a ARRL publication for years but I suspect they
are still talking of radiation as being wave form.

Hmmm ... I am still holding out a bit longer before calling the jury in
... the new developments of being able to take "pictures" of light
waves/particles needs completely explored and given time for the
technology to improve/mature.

But, it certainly looks the absolute proof of what light "is", is a LOT
closer at hand. :-)

Regards,
JS

John , nothing wrong in having a weapon to protect your home and
rights.
It is when those same weapons are used to threaten and scare the
populace
that things go wrong especially when they suggests such threats to
repell free speech
and for all to read before hand! So a projectile must have rotation to
travel in a straight line
but you must not mention that as it is tyrinical. But he did come in
on time as I anticipated
and applied logic to antennas as he sees it. Soon others will take
their turn since logic
applied is getting closer to the norm
When the President was on a train aproaching my town a porter cried
out "ten minuits to Normal"
with respect to the upcoming rail road station
That is how the book by the presidents adviser from Texas was named
i.e. Ten minuits from Normal
so I am very familiar with Normal people
Regards
Art

Art Unwin wrote:

...
so I am very familiar with Normal people
Regards
Art

OK, enough said; and this final comment of mine ends this "normal"
thread ... at least for myself.

You know as well as I, normal is much over-rated. Normal people are
just not that interesting. While violent nuts are a drag; and, nuts
which live in true "La La Land" cannot be tolerated for long periods of
time--the most interesting people lie in between these and "normal" ...

Regards,
JS