On Jul 3, 11:58 pm, Art Unwin wrote:


This was not an insult Art, this was in reference to the last sentence
in your statement which follows -

That is exactly how Hitler came to power where those who did
nothing got their just deserts.
Art

Sounds like a lightly veiled threat to me.

tom
K0TAR

Gee, I have no idea why you say that.
I want somebody, probably from outside America who knows something
about mathematics, communist, muslim or otherwise
who can inform the american ham where the similarity lies between
Gauss and Maxwell .

What? Are you telling us that you don't know math, and
request help to "inform" the American ham about Gauss
and Maxwell?

Let me get this right.. We all want to be clear on this.
You don't know or understand math very well, but you
want someone who does know math to "prove" a theory
cooked up by a person who doesn't use or know math
very well.
So, obviously if you don't know math very well, you must
not have used any to come to your conclusions.

What makes you so sure that the arrival of such a person
with credible math skills will verify and prove your
claims?
That doktor from MIT sure didn't do you any good.
I assume he at least knows a little math...

Sure seems like a stretch to me. We all know how you
came to your conclusions. And math didn't have anything
to do with it. Your antenna was spawned by twiddling
with an antenna modeling and optimization program.

I am sure that there are plenty here who do have the
math skills to calculate most any problem you were to
pose to them.

People can't check the math if no math is given for
them to check.
So what is your excuse for this gross omission?
And don't mention that doktor from MIT.
He didn't provide any math to check either.
What was his excuse for this gross omission?
Oh yea, I remember.. He ducked out and ran off
before giving his excuse.

Of course, you could greatly speed up your quest for
validation if you installed the antenna and ran tests
against known reference antennas.
You would know very quickly if your antenna lives
up to your hype or not.
You would not need any mathematicians to see
if your theory holds water. You would *KNOW*
without all the whiny histrionics.
Your ****ing and moaning about peoples levels of
education strikes me as hilarious when you write
and spell on the level of the average 4th grader.

I don't know who your teachers were, but I feel
certain they must have been incompetent.
Either that, or in your advancing old fartism, you
have gradually lost most everything you were once
taught.
Either that or you just want to be different.
Which is it?

When are you going to get off your ass and actually
try one of these antennas in the real world?
If you won't do it, how can you expect anyone else
to want to mess with it?
The "normal" person will pretty much know it doesn't
work even before trying it. So there is not much
incentive to break a sweat is there?
If you want to prove that your air cooled dummy load
can be an effective radiator, it's all up to you.
Not us.
If you want me to break a sweat to disprove your
antenna, I expect to be well paid for my trouble.
You will also pay for expenses. IE: the hundreds of
feet of 22 gauge wire, two shoe boxes, etc..
If you wish, I will do your work for you for $6,150.00
$6k going to me, the $150 to cover parts and other
expenses.
You can send the check to my listed QRZ address.
After receiving said funds, I will provide detailed
test results within a week.
Note that I require payment before doing the test
just to ensure I actually get paid.
I'm fairly sure that the results of the test will be
unfavorable to your cause, which will likely lead
you to decide not to pay your bill.