THE WEAK FORCE AND THE C.E.R.N. EXPERIMENT
 

THE WEAK FORCE AND THE C.E.R.N. EXPERIMENT
 

On Sep 7, 11:17*pm, wrote:
Art,
* *So it seems that this phrase was used privately between you and one
other person who was not taken 'seriously'. *I can believe that. *So,
this phrase has in fact not been used here on this forum except by
you. *Is that correct, or am I missing something?
*- 'Doc

JS,
Get over it.
*- 'Doc

I seem to be under the prosecutors gaze!
The prevailing theme of this group is to deny change!
They deny the tipping of antennas
They deny the extension of Gauss's law mathematics
They deny the existance of four forces in the standard model
They deny the role of particle science with respect to radiation.
They deny the requirement of equilibrium in all Universal laws
All of this is not bad in itself as long as they provide evidence to
the contrary
but none is provided only contempt of the new. If one did not think
all was known
there would be natural curiousity by those who have searched for truth
via education.
For those who have not endeavered to search for the truth excercise
the freedom of free speech
so that others are able to determine who and what they are so they may
be avoided.

THE WEAK FORCE AND THE C.E.R.N. EXPERIMENT
 

Art,
A 'prosecutor'? Not hardly. I'm trying to understand your way of
thinking about this. Asking questions is a fairly typical way of
finding things out. If I'm asking the wrong questions, then show me
what's wrong with them.
- 'Doc

THE WEAK FORCE AND THE C.E.R.N. EXPERIMENT
 

JS,
You are approaching a 'line' you really don't want to cross. While
it may not be exactly 'welcome', saying things about me is one thing.
Bringing my family into that, right/wrong/indifferent, is a very
different story. Please don't go there, we will both regret it. Or,
as it's said in this redneck part of the world, watch your mouth.
- 'Doc

THE WEAK FORCE AND THE C.E.R.N. EXPERIMENT
 

On Sep 8, 10:42*am, wrote:
Art,
A 'prosecutor'? *Not hardly. *I'm trying to understand your way of
thinking about this. *Asking questions is a fairly typical way of
finding things out. *If I'm asking the wrong questions, then show me
what's wrong with them.
*- 'Doc

Nothing wrong in your line of questioning but your pattern is usually
of stirring
so it depends on what you do with your answers. As to how I think I
will give you an example
Reference was made to "Cosmic particles:" which is a term given to
the" bombardment" of particulates.
So to me that makes me think of what names are applied to particles
that "bombard" which by itself suggests
the possession of spin and velocity, characteristics that are
different from those of neutrinos.
If you know the answer and where they come from I too will be
gratefull if you give me an answer!
Another thought extension of Gaussian law of statics equates to
Maxwells laws thus if one equates both of these to zero
statics particles in space without the influence of gravity and the
responding" weak force" cannot possibly, on their own, radiate
in space UNLESS external components are applied that magnetize the
static particles. Food for thought I would say.
and a measure of how I think. I believe that J.S. thinks in a similar
fashion.

THE WEAK FORCE AND THE C.E.R.N. EXPERIMENT
 

Art Unwin wrote:
... Food for thought I would say.
and a measure of how I think. I believe that J.S. thinks in a similar
fashion.

When you mention my name, could you try to toss in a bit of Shakespeare,
I have gotten used to it, yanno? ;-)

Regards,
JS

--
It is like a nightmare where the public servants are the people which
the police are supposed to protect us from!

THE WEAK FORCE AND THE C.E.R.N. EXPERIMENT
 

THE WEAK FORCE AND THE C.E.R.N. EXPERIMENT
 

On Sep 8, 11:32*am, John Smith wrote:
Art Unwin wrote:
... Food for thought I would say.
and a measure of how I think. I believe that J.S. thinks in a similar
fashion.

When you mention my name, could you try to toss in a bit of Shakespeare,
I have gotten used to it, yanno? *;-)

Regards,
JS

--
It is like a nightmare where the public servants are the people which
the police are supposed to protect us from!

The last time such utterences were made with the follow up
explanation
stated as "Shakesphere" in a haughty manner.
I lifted up a monkey wrench and stated " Sears and Roebuck"
which implied that the "olde english" speaker was devoid of testerone.
and drank tea with three fingers stuck up into the air
Best Regards
Art
to bring him down to Earth

THE WEAK FORCE AND THE C.E.R.N. EXPERIMENT
 

On Mon, 8 Sep 2008 09:30:37 -0700 (PDT), Art Unwin
wrote:

the" bombardment" of particulates.

the usual misspelling of peculiar.

I believe that J.S. thinks in a similar fashion.

Now THERE's validation (and Authur doesn't even know his name)! What's
left to be said?

OK, yeah, I know. Both will have to explain it again, if only to each
other, and then one or the other will claim the other hasn't the
vaguest idea. This should happen in the space of 3 postings.

73's
Richard Clark, KB7QHC

THE WEAK FORCE AND THE C.E.R.N. EXPERIMENT
 

On Sep 8, 12:43*pm, Richard Clark wrote:
On Mon, 8 Sep 2008 09:30:37 -0700 (PDT), Art Unwin

wrote:
the" bombardment" of particulates.

the usual misspelling of peculiar.

I believe that J.S. thinks in a similar fashion.

Now THERE's validation (and Authur doesn't even know his name)! What's
left to be said? *

OK, yeah, I know. *Both will have to explain it again, if only to each
other, and then one or the other will claim the other hasn't the
vaguest idea. *This should happen in the space of 3 postings.

73's
Richard Clark, KB7QHC

Have you still got a girl friend or have you retreated to your old
habits?
Shakesphere?