In Switzerland on the 10th of this month they are going to project a
particle thru the Earths crust at the speed of light. The particle
that they are projecting comes from outer space. So what does this
have to do with antennas?
Low energy particles are in abundance on Earth as they are in space
but they obtain their own magnetic field as they enter the earths
arbitrary field and settle on such things as antennas made from a
diamagnetic material!
When a time varing field is applied to a diamagnetic material two
magnetic fields are generated, primary and secondary both of which
together project the particles off of the radiator with a spinnning
action that provides a straight line projection away from
gravitational effects. The anti gravity force or the electroweak force
is the secondary magnetic field alluded to earlier. This electroweak
force is used regularly in scrap metal yards to sort materials by
ejection from magnetized conveyor line which produces a magnetic field
which ejects metals of a like field into a particular container by the
inter action of two magnetic fields as per antenna/radiator. It is the
secondary force that is known as the weak force which is a closed
field on the material surface called the Foucault current or eddy
current which is also used for non destructive metal examination.So
soon the CERN project will try to mimic the antenna operation by
projecting a particle originaly from outer space thru the crust of the
Earth at near the speed of light where they will be captured by a
large area of water, which is a diamagnetic material just like our
receiving antennas !.
Regards
Art KB9MZ...........xg

Art Unwin wrote:
In Switzerland on the 10th of this month they are going to project a
particle thru the Earths crust at the speed of light. The particle
that they are projecting comes from outer space.

Well actually they are going project 2 locally generated proton beams
around a giant circle at 99.99% the speed of light so that they
collide.

But don't let easily verifiable facts get in your way.

So what does this
have to do with antennas?

Nothing.

Low energy particles are in abundance on Earth as they are in space

Actually, high energy particles are in abundance on Earth as they
are in space, they are called cosmic rays, but again don't let easily
verifiable facts get in your way.

but they obtain their own magnetic field as they enter the earths
arbitrary field and settle on such things as antennas made from a
diamagnetic material!

And thus we have completed our journey to la-la land.

Hope you enjoyed the trip.

snip remaining babble

--
Jim Pennino

Remove .spam.sux to reply.

On Sep 4, 9:45*pm, wrote:
Art Unwin wrote:
In Switzerland on the 10th of this month they are going to project a
particle thru the Earths crust at the speed of light. The particle
that they are projecting comes from outer space.

Well actually they are going project 2 locally generated proton beams
around a giant circle at 99.99% the speed of light so that they
collide.

But don't let easily verifiable facts get in your way.

So what does this
have to do with antennas?

Nothing.

Low energy particles are in abundance on Earth as they are in space

Actually, high energy particles are in abundance on Earth as they
are in space, they are called cosmic rays, but again don't let easily
verifiable facts get in your way.

but they obtain their own magnetic field as they enter the earths
arbitrary field and settle on such things as antennas made from a
diamagnetic material!

And thus we have completed our journey to la-la land.

Hope you enjoyed the trip.

snip remaining babble

--
Jim Pennino

Remove .spam.sux to reply.

My understanding was that the experiment that I described was the
initiating test where the collider experiment
was going to start around November. So If I am behind in the facts,
and I may be, you are surely aware that one of the tests is as I
described !
Either way the search is for info on the leptons and their bye
products such as Neutrinos which I have stated before can well be the
same particle involved with radiatiation. Since you declare your self
so up to date I would like to hear your opinion as to why my
explanation of radiation is incorrect
instead of immittating a reckless smart arse plus your interpretation
of the electro-weak force which overides my explanation?
Arrt

Art Unwin wrote:
On Sep 4, 9:45?pm, wrote:
Art Unwin wrote:
In Switzerland on the 10th of this month they are going to project a
particle thru the Earths crust at the speed of light. The particle
that they are projecting comes from outer space.

Well actually they are going project 2 locally generated proton beams
around a giant circle at 99.99% the speed of light so that they
collide.

But don't let easily verifiable facts get in your way.

So what does this
have to do with antennas?

Nothing.

Low energy particles are in abundance on Earth as they are in space

Actually, high energy particles are in abundance on Earth as they
are in space, they are called cosmic rays, but again don't let easily
verifiable facts get in your way.

but they obtain their own magnetic field as they enter the earths
arbitrary field and settle on such things as antennas made from a
diamagnetic material!

And thus we have completed our journey to la-la land.

Hope you enjoyed the trip.

snip remaining babble

--
Jim Pennino

Remove .spam.sux to reply.

My understanding was that the experiment that I described was the
initiating test where the collider experiment
was going to start around November. So If I am behind in the facts,
and I may be, you are surely aware that one of the tests is as I
described !

Wrong, everything goes around in a circle in a vacuum.

There never was a plan to do anything else.

Nothing is going into the Earth's crust.

Either way the search is for info on the leptons and their bye
products such as Neutrinos which I have stated before can well be the
same particle involved with radiatiation.

Wrong, the search is for information on the collision of large hadrons
which are composed of quarks, not leptons, and specifically to see if
the Higgs boson is produced in the collision.

This would be a step in the search for a so called Grand Unified
Theory which would unify electromagnetism, the strong nuclear force,
and the weak nuclear force, leaving out only gravity.

Neutrinos are leptons, not a by product of leptons.

Since you declare your self
so up to date I would like to hear your opinion as to why my
explanation of radiation is incorrect
instead of immittating a reckless smart arse plus your interpretation
of the electro-weak force which overides my explanation?

I declare myself able to read and as having stayed awake during physics
classes enough to know there is no such thing as an "electro-weak force".

www.cern.ch


--
Jim Pennino

Remove .spam.sux to reply.

On Sep 4, 9:45*pm, wrote:
Art Unwin wrote:
In Switzerland on the 10th of this month they are going to project a
particle thru the Earths crust at the speed of light. The particle
that they are projecting comes from outer space.

Well actually they are going project 2 locally generated proton beams
around a giant circle at 99.99% the speed of light so that they
collide.

But don't let easily verifiable facts get in your way.

So what does this
have to do with antennas?

Nothing.

Low energy particles are in abundance on Earth as they are in space

Actually, high energy particles are in abundance on Earth as they
are in space, they are called cosmic rays, but again don't let easily
verifiable facts get in your way.

but they obtain their own magnetic field as they enter the earths
arbitrary field and settle on such things as antennas made from a
diamagnetic material!

And thus we have completed our journey to la-la land.

Hope you enjoyed the trip.

snip remaining babble

--
Jim Pennino

Remove .spam.sux to reply.

When one referes to Cosmic rays it really shows that he is uninformed.
Informed people would call it an accumullation of particles that
continually bombard
our earth some of which release their energy when collisions occur
with the earths magnetic field.
Such particles are usually clumps bounded together by the force of
colour that is released in the form of an Aurora
where some speculate it is that that feeds energy to the weather
clouds of Earth that provides time varying magnetic fields
which can create tornadoes as a form of eddy current. Those that
bombard or float thru the earth's boundary are in single particle form
and rest on surfaces that will not absorb them into their overall
atomic pattern. Since the earth is more than 95% diagmatic they can
really settle anywhere.
It is these particles that I am refering to and that is not babble
unless you can prove otherwise. These same particles cannot radiate in
space under their own means but only when under the earth's
gravitational influence and where the anti gravity forces become a
reality.(Newton's law in action)
If you are not aware of the particular experiment that I was referring
to then your posting was intended to cause anger because of the
absence
of anything that could be seen as adding to a conversation in a polite
manner.
Art Unwin

Art Unwin wrote:
On Sep 4, 9:45?pm, wrote:
Art Unwin wrote:
In Switzerland on the 10th of this month they are going to project a
particle thru the Earths crust at the speed of light. The particle
that they are projecting comes from outer space.

Well actually they are going project 2 locally generated proton beams
around a giant circle at 99.99% the speed of light so that they
collide.

But don't let easily verifiable facts get in your way.

So what does this
have to do with antennas?

Nothing.

Low energy particles are in abundance on Earth as they are in space

Actually, high energy particles are in abundance on Earth as they
are in space, they are called cosmic rays, but again don't let easily
verifiable facts get in your way.

but they obtain their own magnetic field as they enter the earths
arbitrary field and settle on such things as antennas made from a
diamagnetic material!

And thus we have completed our journey to la-la land.

Hope you enjoyed the trip.

snip remaining babble

--
Jim Pennino

Remove .spam.sux to reply.

When one referes to Cosmic rays it really shows that he is uninformed.
Informed people would call it an accumullation of particles that
continually bombard
our earth some of which release their energy when collisions occur
with the earths magnetic field.

Wrong, the term "cosmic rays" is a misnomer as they are actually
individually arriving partcles, about 90% of which are protons,
9% are helium nuclei or alpha particles and about 1% are electrons.

They collide with the molecules of the atmosphere and produce a
cascade of lighter particles.


Such particles are usually clumps bounded together by the force of
colour that is released in the form of an Aurora
where some speculate it is that that feeds energy to the weather
clouds of Earth that provides time varying magnetic fields
which can create tornadoes as a form of eddy current. Those that
bombard or float thru the earth's boundary are in single particle form
and rest on surfaces that will not absorb them into their overall
atomic pattern. Since the earth is more than 95% diagmatic they can
really settle anywhere.

Utter, babbling nonsense.

Cosmic rays arrive individually and are not clumped.

It is these particles that I am refering to and that is not babble
unless you can prove otherwise.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cosmic_ray
http://helios.gsfc.nasa.gov/cosmic.html
http://www.srl.caltech.edu/personnel...cos_encyc.html
http://www.ngdc.noaa.gov/stp/SOLAR/C...YS/cosmic.html
http://imagine.gsfc.nasa.gov/docs/sc...smic_rays.html
http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu...ro/cosmic.html
http://www2.slac.stanford.edu/vvc/cosmic_rays.html
http://www.ast.leeds.ac.uk/haverah/aims.shtml
http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases...1009160230.htm
http://www.auger.org/

Want more proof you are babbling nonsense?

These same particles cannot radiate in
space under their own means but only when under the earth's
gravitational influence and where the anti gravity forces become a
reality.(Newton's law in action)

More babbling nonsense.

The particles come from space.

Gravity has little influence on them.

There is no such thing as "the anti gravity forces".

The velocities and energies are such that Newtonian physics doesn't
apply and you are forced to use relativistic physics.

If you are not aware of the particular experiment that I was referring
to then your posting was intended to cause anger because of the
absence
of anything that could be seen as adding to a conversation in a polite
manner.

There is no such experiment.

www.cern.ch


--
Jim Pennino

Remove .spam.sux to reply.

On Sep 4, 11:05*pm, wrote:
Art Unwin wrote:
On Sep 4, 9:45?pm, wrote:
Art Unwin wrote:
In Switzerland on the 10th of this month they are going to project a
particle thru the Earths crust at the speed of light. The particle
that they are projecting comes from outer space.

Well actually they are going project 2 locally generated proton beams
around a giant circle at 99.99% the speed of light so that they
collide.

But don't let easily verifiable facts get in your way.

So what does this
have to do with antennas?

Nothing.

Low energy particles are in abundance on Earth as they are in space

Actually, high energy particles are in abundance on Earth as they
are in space, they are called cosmic rays, but again don't let easily
verifiable facts get in your way.

but they obtain their own magnetic field as they enter the earths
arbitrary field and settle on such things as antennas made from a
diamagnetic material!

And thus we have completed our journey to la-la land.

Hope you enjoyed the trip.

snip remaining babble

--
Jim Pennino

Remove .spam.sux to reply.

My understanding was that the experiment that I described was the
initiating test where the collider experiment
was going to start around November. So If I am behind in the facts,
and I may be, you are surely aware that one of the tests is as I
described !

Wrong, everything goes around in a circle in a vacuum.

There never was a plan to do anything else.

Nothing is going into the Earth's crust.

Either way the search is for info on the *leptons and their bye
products such as Neutrinos which I have stated before can well be the
same particle involved with radiatiation.

Wrong, the search is for information on the collision of large hadrons
which are composed of quarks, not leptons, and specifically to see if
the Higgs boson is produced in the collision.

This would be a step in the search for a so called Grand Unified
Theory which would unify electromagnetism, the strong nuclear force,
and the weak nuclear force, leaving out only gravity.

Neutrinos are leptons, not a by product of leptons.

Since you declare your self
so up to date I would like to hear your opinion as to why my
explanation of radiation is incorrect
instead of immittating a reckless smart arse plus *your interpretation
of the electro-weak force which overides my explanation?

I declare myself able to read and as having stayed awake during physics
classes enough to know there is no such thing as an "electro-weak force".

www.cern.ch

--
Jim Pennino

Remove .spam.sux to reply.

Oh my!
Leptons are objects of different flavours one of which the neutrino
evolves from.
If I remember correctly there are 4 types of leptons one of which is a
clump of five or more
electrons of which three are of colour form i.e. heavy binding forces
As far as there is no such thing as a electroweak force. The standard
model of physics has four forces of which electro weak
or anti gravity force is one, Einstein spent his whole life looking
for it and it is expected that Higgs field will provide
details. If you want to disagree about the four forces and reduce them
to three then be my guest but it is the weak force
that provides the tilting force on a antenna in equilibrium. I
understand that one sea port have tilted all their antennas to get
improved performance
which is provided by the "weak" force and its presence is verified by
the laws of Maxwell and Newton The experiment I am refering to is the
projection of particles from a near earth surface and where the
particles travel in a straight line at right angles to the center of
the earth where they penetrate the earths surface and emerge some
hundred miles away, the particles being called neutrinos which are low
life radiation particles that escape from the Sun's
arbitrary boundary. They are one of many types of particles that exist
in the Universe some of which are distributed by solar winds.
I would be very interested on what grounds you dismiss the existance
of the "weak" force since all the masters of science include that
force for the attainment of equilibriumaround which all Universal laws
are based around..The weak force does not exist in outer space but
when gravity enters the situation Newtons law states for every action
there is a reactionI Was Faraday,Newton Coloumn,Gauss, Einstein,
Feyman and others all totally in error because of something that YOU
have found?
Why not print your physics fact sheet so that CERN can redirect their
efforts?
Art Unwin......KB9MZ

On Sep 4, 11:45*pm, wrote:
Art Unwin wrote:
On Sep 4, 9:45?pm, wrote:
Art Unwin wrote:
In Switzerland on the 10th of this month they are going to project a
particle thru the Earths crust at the speed of light. The particle
that they are projecting comes from outer space.

Well actually they are going project 2 locally generated proton beams
around a giant circle at 99.99% the speed of light so that they
collide.

But don't let easily verifiable facts get in your way.

So what does this
have to do with antennas?

Nothing.

Low energy particles are in abundance on Earth as they are in space

Actually, high energy particles are in abundance on Earth as they
are in space, they are called cosmic rays, but again don't let easily
verifiable facts get in your way.

but they obtain their own magnetic field as they enter the earths
arbitrary field and settle on such things as antennas made from a
diamagnetic material!

And thus we have completed our journey to la-la land.

Hope you enjoyed the trip.

snip remaining babble

--
Jim Pennino

Remove .spam.sux to reply.

When one referes to Cosmic rays it really shows that he is uninformed.
Informed people would call it an accumullation of particles that
continually bombard
our earth some of which release their energy when collisions occur
with the earths magnetic field.

Wrong, the term "cosmic rays" is a misnomer as they are actually
individually arriving partcles, about 90% of which are protons,
9% are helium nuclei or alpha particles and about 1% are electrons.

They collide with the molecules of the atmosphere and produce a
cascade of lighter particles.

Such particles are usually clumps bounded together by the force of
colour that is released in the form of an Aurora
where some speculate it *is that that feeds energy to the weather
clouds of Earth that provides time varying magnetic fields
which can create tornadoes as a form of eddy current. Those that
bombard or float thru the earth's boundary are in single particle form
and rest on surfaces that will not absorb them into their overall
atomic pattern. Since the earth is more than 95% diagmatic they can
really settle anywhere.

Utter, babbling nonsense.

Cosmic rays arrive individually and are not clumped.

It is these particles that I am refering to and that is not babble
unless you can prove otherwise.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cosmic_...www.auger.org/

Want more proof you are babbling nonsense?

These same particles cannot radiate in
space under their own means but only when under the earth's
gravitational influence and where the anti gravity forces become a
reality.(Newton's law in action)

More babbling nonsense.

The particles come from space.

Gravity has little influence on them.

There is no such thing as "the anti gravity forces".

The velocities and energies are such that Newtonian physics doesn't
apply and you are forced to use relativistic physics.

If you are not aware of the particular experiment that I was referring
to then your posting was intended to cause anger *because of the
absence
of anything that could be seen as adding to a conversation in a polite
manner.

There is no such experiment.

www.cern.ch

--
Jim Pennino

Remove .spam.sux to reply.

Cosmic rays are particles as you stated Wilkpedia said as much by
saying it is a misnomer,
I also called them particles which is what you contradicted !
Personaly I do not know what the word "ray" defines with respect to
physics since physics
is built around particles that can oscillate. I believe most if not
all of your statements are false
and thus raise the question of validity when you espouse about
antennas of which the "weak" force
is a vital component of radiation directivity and density.
As far as the experiment that I refered to as being non existent the
same as the presence of four forces
with respect to the standard model I would remind you that similar
tests were done in I believe Japan,
where they had difficulty in harvesting the amount of neutrinos that
they had calculated upon but later
proved their calculations were correct. Neutrinos seemes to be the
center of Physics these days with
the may publications yet you seem to know so little about the subject.
I think you have said enough
on this thread to expose yourself
Art

Art Unwin wrote:
On Sep 4, 11:05?pm, wrote:
Art Unwin wrote:
On Sep 4, 9:45?pm, wrote:
Art Unwin wrote:
In Switzerland on the 10th of this month they are going to project a
particle thru the Earths crust at the speed of light. The particle
that they are projecting comes from outer space.

Well actually they are going project 2 locally generated proton beams
around a giant circle at 99.99% the speed of light so that they
collide.

But don't let easily verifiable facts get in your way.

So what does this
have to do with antennas?

Nothing.

Low energy particles are in abundance on Earth as they are in space

Actually, high energy particles are in abundance on Earth as they
are in space, they are called cosmic rays, but again don't let easily
verifiable facts get in your way.

but they obtain their own magnetic field as they enter the earths
arbitrary field and settle on such things as antennas made from a
diamagnetic material!

And thus we have completed our journey to la-la land.

Hope you enjoyed the trip.

snip remaining babble

--
Jim Pennino

Remove .spam.sux to reply.

My understanding was that the experiment that I described was the
initiating test where the collider experiment
was going to start around November. So If I am behind in the facts,
and I may be, you are surely aware that one of the tests is as I
described !

Wrong, everything goes around in a circle in a vacuum.

There never was a plan to do anything else.

Nothing is going into the Earth's crust.

Either way the search is for info on the ?leptons and their bye
products such as Neutrinos which I have stated before can well be the
same particle involved with radiatiation.

Wrong, the search is for information on the collision of large hadrons
which are composed of quarks, not leptons, and specifically to see if
the Higgs boson is produced in the collision.

This would be a step in the search for a so called Grand Unified
Theory which would unify electromagnetism, the strong nuclear force,
and the weak nuclear force, leaving out only gravity.

Neutrinos are leptons, not a by product of leptons.

Since you declare your self
so up to date I would like to hear your opinion as to why my
explanation of radiation is incorrect
instead of immittating a reckless smart arse plus ?your interpretation
of the electro-weak force which overides my explanation?

I declare myself able to read and as having stayed awake during physics
classes enough to know there is no such thing as an "electro-weak force".

www.cern.ch

--
Jim Pennino

Remove .spam.sux to reply.

Oh my!
Leptons are objects of different flavours one of which the neutrino
evolves from.
If I remember correctly there are 4 types of leptons one of which is a
clump of five or more
electrons of which three are of colour form i.e. heavy binding forces
As far as there is no such thing as a electroweak force. The standard
model of physics has four forces of which electro weak
or anti gravity force is one, Einstein spent his whole life looking
for it and it is expected that Higgs field will provide
details. If you want to disagree about the four forces and reduce them
to three then be my guest but it is the weak force
that provides the tilting force on a antenna in equilibrium. I
understand that one sea port have tilted all their antennas to get
improved performance
which is provided by the "weak" force and its presence is verified by
the laws of Maxwell and Newton The experiment I am refering to is the
projection of particles from a near earth surface and where the
particles travel in a straight line at right angles to the center of
the earth where they penetrate the earths surface and emerge some
hundred miles away, the particles being called neutrinos which are low
life radiation particles that escape from the Sun's
arbitrary boundary. They are one of many types of particles that exist
in the Universe some of which are distributed by solar winds.
I would be very interested on what grounds you dismiss the existance
of the "weak" force since all the masters of science include that
force for the attainment of equilibriumaround which all Universal laws
are based around..The weak force does not exist in outer space but
when gravity enters the situation Newtons law states for every action
there is a reactionI Was Faraday,Newton Coloumn,Gauss, Einstein,
Feyman and others all totally in error because of something that YOU
have found?
Why not print your physics fact sheet so that CERN can redirect their
efforts?
Art Unwin......KB9MZ

The people at CERN already know what they are doing and none of it
even comes close to matching all your babbling nonsense.

www.cern.ch

It would take more hours than I care to invest to correct all this
babble.

Try these:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lepton
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Force
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neutrino
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Higgs_boson


--
Jim Pennino

Remove .spam.sux to reply.

wrote in message
...
Art Unwin wrote:
On Sep 4, 9:45?pm, wrote:
Art Unwin wrote:
In Switzerland on the 10th of this month they are going to project a
particle thru the Earths crust at the speed of light. The particle
that they are projecting comes from outer space.

Well actually they are going project 2 locally generated proton beams
around a giant circle at 99.99% the speed of light so that they
collide.

But don't let easily verifiable facts get in your way.

So what does this
have to do with antennas?

Nothing.

Low energy particles are in abundance on Earth as they are in space

Actually, high energy particles are in abundance on Earth as they
are in space, they are called cosmic rays, but again don't let easily
verifiable facts get in your way.

but they obtain their own magnetic field as they enter the earths
arbitrary field and settle on such things as antennas made from a
diamagnetic material!

And thus we have completed our journey to la-la land.

Hope you enjoyed the trip.

snip remaining babble

--
Jim Pennino

Remove .spam.sux to reply.

When one referes to Cosmic rays it really shows that he is uninformed.
Informed people would call it an accumullation of particles that
continually bombard
our earth some of which release their energy when collisions occur
with the earths magnetic field.

Wrong, the term "cosmic rays" is a misnomer as they are actually
individually arriving partcles, about 90% of which are protons,
9% are helium nuclei or alpha particles and about 1% are electrons.

They collide with the molecules of the atmosphere and produce a
cascade of lighter particles.


Such particles are usually clumps bounded together by the force of
colour that is released in the form of an Aurora
where some speculate it is that that feeds energy to the weather
clouds of Earth that provides time varying magnetic fields
which can create tornadoes as a form of eddy current. Those that
bombard or float thru the earth's boundary are in single particle form
and rest on surfaces that will not absorb them into their overall
atomic pattern. Since the earth is more than 95% diagmatic they can
really settle anywhere.

Utter, babbling nonsense.

Cosmic rays arrive individually and are not clumped.

It is these particles that I am refering to and that is not babble
unless you can prove otherwise.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cosmic_ray
http://helios.gsfc.nasa.gov/cosmic.html
http://www.srl.caltech.edu/personnel...cos_encyc.html
http://www.ngdc.noaa.gov/stp/SOLAR/C...YS/cosmic.html
http://imagine.gsfc.nasa.gov/docs/sc...smic_rays.html
http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu...ro/cosmic.html
http://www2.slac.stanford.edu/vvc/cosmic_rays.html
http://www.ast.leeds.ac.uk/haverah/aims.shtml
http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases...1009160230.htm
http://www.auger.org/

Want more proof you are babbling nonsense?

These same particles cannot radiate in
space under their own means but only when under the earth's
gravitational influence and where the anti gravity forces become a
reality.(Newton's law in action)

More babbling nonsense.

The particles come from space.

Gravity has little influence on them.

There is no such thing as "the anti gravity forces".

The velocities and energies are such that Newtonian physics doesn't
apply and you are forced to use relativistic physics.

If you are not aware of the particular experiment that I was referring
to then your posting was intended to cause anger because of the
absence
of anything that could be seen as adding to a conversation in a polite
manner.

There is no such experiment.

www.cern.ch


--
Jim Pennino

Remove .spam.sux to reply.

welcome back art, i needed a good laugh today! your statement about
tornados being caused by eddy currents is a real knee slapper! keep up the
good work, some day with all your material you could be a stand up act at a
physics convention. guaranteed to bring the house down!