LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #8   Report Post  
Old September 12th 08, 10:21 PM posted to rec.radio.amateur.antenna
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Mar 2008
Posts: 1,339
Default Light,Lazers and HF

On Sep 12, 3:17*pm, "Dave" wrote:
"Frank" wrote in message

news:iWzyk.2033$1x6.488@edtnps82...

This has lead us to the *obsurd present point where a cubic foot size
antenna for top band should have
its reflecter a couple of blocks away and of a size stretching for
several thousand feet instead of a few inches
where if the antenna was a ball of presureized water the close
reflector would prevent the jet of water spreading to the rear.


Given a 3 ft copper dipole on 1.9 MHz the free space gain is -4.6 dbi,
and exhibits a classic dipole radiation pattern. *Placing a 6 ft diameter,
radial reflector 3 ft from the antenna has no effect on the radiation
pattern,
other than a slight reduction in gain to -5.2 dbi.


Frank


you really don't think art is going to believe that do you?? *it is after
all based on a piece of software using maxwell's equations... which he has
said he believes in and that the software works, because it obviously shows
that his antenna produces a spotlight beam when you tilt it the right
angle... but he won't believe yours.


Ofcourse I do! it is very logical
You certainly must have a reflector that extends beyond the emmiter
dimensions
A dipole extends about 500 feet where as mine extends one
foot.!........Big difference. Like comparing a miniature light bulb
with a string of flourescent lights in an office building.
Has it quit raining yet? you seem to be all wet I think you need to
speak to the Navy and provide some of your expertise.
One Navy port has tilted all of their antennas for better performance
per the permission of an Admiral no less.
Do you know more about antennas than they do? This analysis is easily
proved per Maxwell equations so you should be able to
dispute what the Navy did. Why are they tilted? Because they are
including the "weak" force present in Maxwells calculations.
Is Maxwell all wet too? Computer programs based on Maxwells laws prove
it is correct so try Eznec for your self.
Tilt a long wire from vertical until it is fully resistive and the
field will show gain. You just do not have any clothes.
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Announcement - The Radio-Mart Red Drap Is Now Second Rate - We Now Have Blue-Sky-Radio's Blue-Green Drap Fading . . . Into The Bright-White-Light ! {Come Into The Light !} RHF Shortwave 3 September 22nd 06 08:08 AM
FA vintage RCA on air light pete Swap 0 November 13th 03 04:30 AM
DC to light recommendation? Steve Cohen Shortwave 10 July 5th 03 01:43 PM
DC to Light Recommendation Steve Cohen General 0 July 2nd 03 07:17 AM
DC to Light Recommendation? Steve Cohen Homebrew 0 July 2nd 03 07:17 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:53 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017