wrote:
That would be true if the casual observer did not consider truly empty
space to be nothingness. I do.

That's obviously a logical contradiction. Space is
something. If space is there, then something is there.
If nothing is there, then space cannot possibly be
there.
--
73, Cecil http://www.w5dxp.com

That would be true if the casual observer did not consider truly empty
space to be nothingness. I do.

That's obviously a logical contradiction. Space is
something. If space is there, then something is there.
If nothing is there, then space cannot possibly be
there.
--
73, Cecil http://www.w5dxp.com

So if nothing is there, it aint nothing after all?

JB wrote:
So if nothing is there, it aint nothing after all?

There is no "there" within the space of our universe
where nothing is there. Casimir effect experiments
have been run on spaces where nothing is supposed to
be. But instead of nothing, they found the quantum soup
which is the space occupied by our universe.
--
73, Cecil http://www.w5dxp.com

"Cecil Moore" wrote in message
...
JB wrote:
So if nothing is there, it aint nothing after all?

There is no "there" within the space of our universe
where nothing is there. Casimir effect experiments
have been run on spaces where nothing is supposed to
be. But instead of nothing, they found the quantum soup
which is the space occupied by our universe.
--
73, Cecil http://www.w5dxp.com

Don't blame me, I never spilled any quantum soup in your space.