| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
#11
September 17th 08, 01:07 PM
posted to rec.radio.amateur.antenna
|
|||
|
|||
Equilibrium in free space
Cecil Moore wrote:
wrote: This is not relevant to the orginal discussion. On the contrary, this is the crux of the original discussion - whether a wave can exist outside the structure of the universe, whatever that may be. Cecil: That was what I got out of it ... but then, I focused on Arts' observation, "One thing is certain, Gauss states that static particles cannot radiate in free space as there is no exchange of flux ... " And, obviously, IMHO, he is referring to a space truly "composed of nothing" and absent of anything even resembling an ether. And, I did accept that as the crux of his ponder-ings/point(s.) However, also buried in his text are obvious references to a space such as the one our universe resides in ... So, once again, one of those arguments/debates which could go on forever ... and I got those prior appointments ... ;-) Regards, JS |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| Supporting theory that Antennas "Match" to 377 Ohms (Free space) | Antenna | |||
| Equilibrium | Antenna | |||
| Gaussian equilibrium | Antenna | |||
| Question about free space loss ... | Antenna | |||
| Free space pathloss calcs and factor K | Antenna | |||
Threaded Mode
