Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Cecil Moore wrote:
... Maybe "absence of anything even resembling a structure" would be a better way to put it. It's pretty clear that if there is no structure for space, then space cannot exist. Absolute nothing would necessarily be the absence of any and every *thing* including space. Well, yeah, that would pretty much be my call. Its' just a bit to "swallow." And, add to that the fact, we have never seen "nothing", but then probably never will ... LOL I have been attempting to locate my exact old school physics text(s), have had no luck. But, if I remember correctly, my books only mentioned Einsteins first claim, that the structure/ether of space does not exist. Indeed, if I am remembering correctly, they lumped structure/ether together with alchemists, charlatans, magic, witches, etc. ... Somewhere, later in college, I am suspecting, Einstein, this time reneging on that claim, was quoted again, this time allowing for the structure/ether: Ether and the Theory of Relativity Albert Einstein, an address delivered on May 5th, 1920, in the University of Leyden. " ... More careful reflection teaches us, however, that the special theory of relativity does not compel us to deny ether. We may assume the existence of an ether,; only we must give up ascribing a definite state of motion to it, i.e. we must by abstraction take from it the last mechanical characteristic which Lorentz had still left it. We shall see later that this point of view, the conceivability of which shall at once endeavour to make more intelligible by a somewhat halting comparison, is justified by the results of the general theory of relativity. .... " His implication in the words, " ... we must by abstraction take from it the last mechanical characteristic ... ", implies the ether will, almost, be as difficult to "view" as "nothing." 8-) LET ME POINT OUT, Einstein was NOT too intimidated to use that ugly word, "ether." ;-) This is supposed to be the exact text, translated, from his presentation. If someone knows of another which differs, please let me know ... Regards, JS |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Supporting theory that Antennas "Match" to 377 Ohms (Free space) | Antenna | |||
Equilibrium | Antenna | |||
Gaussian equilibrium | Antenna | |||
Question about free space loss ... | Antenna | |||
Free space pathloss calcs and factor K | Antenna |