Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sep 17, 6:01*pm, Cecil Moore wrote:
wrote: ... I disagree since empty space is also "nothing" as defined in this universe. Empty space,in locii where the exotic paricles do not exist, needs no structure. It is that without structure. You need to update your knowledge to the 21st century. "Empty" space has been proved not to be empty and therefore not "nothing". -- 73, Cecil *http://www.w5dxp.com Please show me the reference that proves empty is not nothing and I will prove by definition of the word empty that empty is not something. This is true even in the 21st centruy. |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Supporting theory that Antennas "Match" to 377 Ohms (Free space) | Antenna | |||
Equilibrium | Antenna | |||
Gaussian equilibrium | Antenna | |||
Question about free space loss ... | Antenna | |||
Free space pathloss calcs and factor K | Antenna |