LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #11   Report Post  
Old September 19th 08, 01:54 PM posted to rec.radio.amateur.antenna
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Mar 2007
Posts: 3,521
Default Equilibrium in free space

wrote:
Now I see where you are getting all this sci-fi. Finally. You mistake
a philosophical, abstract ether with the type of physical ether being
inferred in this thread, i.e. the ether that was banished from normal
scientific thought by Einstein in 1905 after publishing the Special
Theory.


Sorry, you are mistaken. Here's a quote of what Einstein said:
"The special theory of relativity does not compel us to deny
the aether. We may assume the existence of an ether, only we
must give up ascribing a definite state of motion to it, ..."

That's what modern quantum physicists have done. No
"state of motion" is ascribed to the particles winking
in and out of existence in the quantum soup of space.

Also quoting "The History of Modern Science":

"Einstein himself, in his application of relativity
principles to the gravitational theory (1915), supposed
that a gravitating body distorts nearby space, and that
these distortions determine the trajectory of a passing
ponderable body. An entity that can distort its shape,
deflect light, and propagate electric and magnetic
disturbances can be called a void only by discourtesy.
More recently, quantum electrodynamics has filled the
void with a vacuum that undergoes energy fluctuations
and acts as a theater for the creation and annihilation
of virtual particles."

If the void was absolutely empty, there would be nothing
there that could be distorted by gravity. Yet we know that
the void is indeed distorted by gravity. Ergo, the void
is NOT empty in the absolute sense of the word.
--
73, Cecil
http://www.w5dxp.com
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Supporting theory that Antennas "Match" to 377 Ohms (Free space) Dr. Slick Antenna 183 October 2nd 20 10:44 AM
Equilibrium art Antenna 16 October 17th 07 01:27 AM
Gaussian equilibrium art Antenna 0 February 26th 07 08:54 PM
Question about free space loss ... Doug McLaren Antenna 1 November 9th 05 02:09 AM
Free space pathloss calcs and factor K Bob Bob Antenna 6 September 27th 05 05:37 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:51 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017