Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Tam wrote:
Roy, What's your opinion on the 4: or 6:1 balun between the 300 Ohm line and the coax? I see no reason whatever to think that the impedance coming off the 300 Ohm line is anywhere near 300 Ohms. Also, where is it written that a 50 Ohm balun will work at, say, 2000 Ohms. The ferrites as you suggest will clearly work if you use enough of them. The reason for asking this is that a friend is in the process of putting up a 75 m dipole, which he only plans to use on 75 m. Everybody is telling him to feed it with ladder line going to coax through a balun. Why in the world would you do that? As you suspect, the impedances encountered by the transformer on some bands are wildly different than its nominal design impedances. In the one which I carefully measured, the result was no surprise. When the antenna impedance was substantially different from 300 + j0, the transformation ratio wasn't 6:1, and the transformer added series and/or shunt reactance, sometimes a pretty large amount. And this was the case on most bands. This isn't to say that an OCF dipole can't be fiddled until, radiating feedline and all, it manages to present an acceptable SWR on several bands. But when it does, it's not working at all like predicted by a simplified analysis which ignores the strong feedline coupling and very non-ideal transformer effects. Roy Lewallen, W7EL |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Carolina Windom using 300 ohm ladderline | Antenna | |||
Results: Carolina Windom | Antenna | |||
Ferrite cores instead of a 1:1 current-choke UnUn for a Carolina Windom | Antenna | |||
FA: Carolina Windom 160M | Swap | |||
Carolina Windom | Antenna |