Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article , Cecil Moore
wrote: John Smith wrote: If you can't make a SIMPLE statement (or paper), on a concept, which an average layman can understand, you probably don't understand the concept(s) yourself ... end of story. Here's a simple statement he could have made about reflected power not being lost: In a conjugately matched system using lossless transmission line: Source Power = Forward Power - Reflected Power = Load Power Hello, and in a general case one has to be careful in dealing with the concepts of "forward" and "reflected" when talking about power. It can become an issue when source impedance, tranmission line characteristic impedance, and load impedance all have different values. The "matched" value corresponding to no reflections might not be the value for maximum power transfer from source to load. In this general case incident (forward) voltage or current from the source becomes a function of mismatch between the source and the reference impedance (e.g. 50 ohms) and the mismatch between the load and reference. When the source is matched this dependency vanishes and the incident power is the same as the "available" power (Vsource^2/(4 * Real part of source impedance)) from the source. The source can be "matched" to the input of the transmission line feeding the load but not be conjugately matched to the transmission line/load combination. Conversely, we can have reflections present at the source-line interface for conjugate match conditions. Sincerely, and 73s from N4GGO, John Wood (Code 5550) e-mail: Naval Research Laboratory 4555 Overlook Avenue, SW Washington, DC 20375-5337 |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
J. B. Wood wrote:
Cecil Moore wrote: In a conjugately matched system using lossless transmission line: Source Power = Forward Power - Reflected Power = Load Power The source can be "matched" to the input of the transmission line feeding the load but not be conjugately matched to the transmission line/load combination. Note that I specified an ideal lossless transmission line. In a lossless system, if a conjugate match exists anywhere, a conjugate match exists everywhere. My assertion was a conceptual statement about an ideal example. Conversely, we can have reflections present at the source-line interface for conjugate match conditions. I was also assuming a 50 ohm source with a 50 ohm Z0-match in a lossless system. I should have specified such. Here is what I had in mind. XMTR---50 ohm coax---+---1/8WL 300 ohm twinlead---(97.3-j283.8) There is a (close enough) 50 ohm Z0-match at '+' :-) -- 73, Cecil http://www.w5dxp.com "According to the general theory of relativity, space without ether is unthinkable." Albert Einstein |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Cecil Moore wrote:
... Note that I specified an ideal lossless transmission line. In a lossless system, if a conjugate match exists anywhere, a conjugate match exists everywhere. My assertion was a conceptual statement about an ideal example. ... Cecil: I believe so ... However, you have been lifting weights with your brain. These things look elementary to you; your only mistake is you do not strive for even a simpler example, to let those wishing to, catch that first step ... The lossless line is a key. Remember those lines of force around a magnet which can be seen with some iron powder and a paper? These are being stored within the ether; you are seeing the only feeble proof of the ethers existence--magnetic lines of force, in that simple experiment. Remember the plans to store energy in a superconductor configured in an endless loop? Where do people think that energy is being stored? In the electrons and other particles? Naaa ... it is being stored within the ether--in magnetic lines of force ... You lossless line has no loss, simple. 100% of the power being stored in the ether is being gotten back from the ether (and your lossless line is a superconductor.) And, when that condition exists, the workings of the antenna become a bit more clear (visible) ... Art says some of this in his "ramblings", most just don't look for it .... Art just obsfucates beyond recognition (or fubar!) Regards, JS |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
G5RV vs. G5RV Jr. | Antenna | |||
G5RV | Dx | |||
G5RV | General | |||
G5RV | Dx | |||
Using a G5RV on 60m | Antenna |