Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sep 26, 5:13*pm, "Richard Fry" wrote:
"Art Unwin" wrote... Now the antiresonant point will be between 100 and 200 ohms resistive *which allows me to feed it directly from a 50 ohm transmission line (3/4 andrews) with negligable losses as the mismatch is resistive. __________ Art - An antenna with an input impedance of 150 + j 0 ohms has a reflection coefficient of 0.5 (50%), a return loss of 6.02 dB, and an SWR of 3:1 to a 50 ohm source. *Probably not many transmitters would be happy with that magnitude of load mismatch. Do you maintain that the losses defined by these parameters are negligible to amateur radio operators? RF Not when you are in the experimental mode. My output are tubular and while I am experimenting I am loath to add a transformer. Must admit I am very surprized at the losses you calculated. I would have thought it have been about half of that but then I should have looked it up instead of relying on the 3/4 andrews keeping things down. For recording the resistance and capacitance over a few megerhertz I aam comfortable with what I am doing since things will change when I take it off the 50 gallon plastic drum. |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Lens' observations ... | Policy | |||
IMD observations | Shortwave | |||
Initial Observations on the Eton S350DL and the Kaito WRX911 | Shortwave | |||
Observations and predictions on the NPRM | Policy | |||
WGN 720 Silent Period-Observations | Shortwave |