| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
#18
|
|||
|
|||
|
JB wrote:
... after that, there is sufficient loss, that your 100 watt radio is now an 80 watt radio. It may be a neat portable feature, but since you have to get the antenna down below 3:1 anyway. Might just as well do it right from the beginning or at least get a big tuner. We didn't worry about these things with the Pi-net tuning. ... 100 to 80? That ain't even worth sweating, they guy on the other end will hardly notice ... however, the SWR causing that will cause a noticeable difference in your received signal from him ... Regards, JS |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| Lens' observations ... | Policy | |||
| IMD observations | Shortwave | |||
| Initial Observations on the Eton S350DL and the Kaito WRX911 | Shortwave | |||
| Observations and predictions on the NPRM | Policy | |||
| WGN 720 Silent Period-Observations | Shortwave | |||