Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#32
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sep 28, 2:05*pm, John Smith wrote:
Art Unwin wrote: ... You think so? Art Actually, I will go out on a limb over this point. I have always found that a mis-matched, or "out of specs", antenna will continue to "ring the ether" a bit more efficiently than it will "pluck a signal from the ether." I have simply grown to accept this from actual hands-on experience ... your mileage may vary ... and, of course, a poor antenna will continue to be poor even when perfectly matched and within original design specs. Regards, JS John, do you really think you can calibrate an S meter by ear if the S levels were scrambled ? |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Lens' observations ... | Policy | |||
IMD observations | Shortwave | |||
Initial Observations on the Eton S350DL and the Kaito WRX911 | Shortwave | |||
Observations and predictions on the NPRM | Policy | |||
WGN 720 Silent Period-Observations | Shortwave |