Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
En Yuri Blanarovich va escriure en 10 Mar 2004 14:47:54 GMT:
The apparently easier and safest way to go is not switching at the very edge but at some 70% of the element. Why do you want use pneumatic switches to disconnect part of the antenna? Why not use the LC traps? They provide "automatic" switching. Because, appart from being dificult to build and tune (to me) they restrict a lot the useful bandwidth. I have not found a trapped design that didn't present a very narrow SWR curve. With a switched diople for 10/15/17/40 I should be able to operate full-band moderatelly well on all of them (specially, all of 28-30 MHz), even if the antenna detunes a bit with aging. As for pneumatic operation it is for simplicity. I would have used relays but then you have to start thinking on RF chokes and decoupling both the feeding and the control line. Compressed air tubes are non-conductive = no-problem. Again, I like the simplicity of it. Price is not very diferent. Toni - EA3FYA |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Inverted ground plane antenna: compared with normal GP and low dipole. | Antenna | |||
40 meter dipole or 88 feet doublet | Antenna | |||
Dipole Next To Home-Is That A Problem?? | Antenna | |||
shortened dipole loaded | Antenna | |||
Comet VA30 (base loaded tri-band dipole 40/15/10) | Antenna |