Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#13
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() DXE also warn us that 'tuner' style baluns such as the one you used are more likely to be reactive an higher frequencies... presumably a consequence of thicker wire insulation which increases the Zo of the TL sections which results in less ideal impedance transformation with increasing frequency. Thanks for the input. The strange thing is that the system failed at ALL freq's. The original use of the balun was with a folded dipole and a feedline of 300 ohm twinlead cut to an odd multiple of the lowest freq desired...which I did and it worked reasonably well. I cannot understand how this application (the CW OCF) is significantly different from the original one, at least in terms of using a 4:1 balun. Allow me to put this to rest. I can live with it as it is, theoretical considerations notwithstanding. I don't want to go over to the dark side, but, hey, it works. Maybe I have a new "Magic" Antenna. John AB8O |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Carolina Windom revisited: 4 to 1 balun does nothing to choke RF? | Antenna | |||
Carolina Windom using 300 ohm ladderline | Antenna | |||
FS: Carolina Windom 75 Meter Ant | Swap | |||
FA: Carolina Windom 160M | Swap | |||
Carolina Windom | Antenna |