| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
On 31 okt, 10:17, Scott Stephens wrote:
Since antennas have reactance and radiation resistance, are they always critically damped, or will they ring-down? Is this implied by a swr plot? Can I take 3db points as antenna bandwidth and assume a radiation-resistance loaded-Q from that? Does feed-point impedance change radiation resistance? Thanks Hello, A small tuned loop behaves as a lumped RLC circuit around the center frequency. Small means small w.r.t. lambda. It has small relative BW (rel. BW = useful BW / Fcenter). It shows lots of ringing. Of course, the model is only valid for the frequency range where size lambda. For small loops (especially loops on PCB), most losses are ohmic, just a part of the losses is due to radiation. When you make a good air loop (with air or vacuum capacitor), the Q factor can be over 1000 (so your -3dB impedance bandwidth is very low at HF frequencies). Your VSWR=2 useful bandwidth is about 70% of the 3 dB impedance bandwidth of the antenna. Thin half wave dipoles can also be modeled with a RLC circuit. The R is frequency dependent, but in a limited frequency range, a simple RLC circuit is useful. When more accuracy is required , or larger frequency range, a transmission line model with lumped losses is better. HW dipoles close to perfect conducting ground have narrow useful BW, hence high Q factor and the RLC model matches better. Thicker dipoles have wider bandwidth (so lower Q factor). In that case even within the useful frequency range the radiation resistance varies (it increases with increasing frequency). When the Thickness of the dipole (think of a biconical dipole), is in the range of 0.15 lambda or more, Q factor will be that low, that you can hardly see the exponential decaying sinusoidal wave (so it behaves more like a heavily damped circuit). If you have access to EM simulation SW you might simulate a construction and compare the impedance versus frequency for your LRC equivalent model. Back to your question, most narrow band antennas are not critically damped and have an impulse response with exponential decaying sinusoidal wave shape. Are you in GPR or equivalent? Best regards, Wim PA3DJS www.tetech.nl The mail is OK when you remove abc. |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| loop vs dipole | Antenna | |||
| FYI - New AM {Medium Wave} DX Loop Antenna using Litz Wire plus Longwave LW Lowfer DX Loop Antenna | Shortwave | |||
| Dipole vs. Delta loop vs. Quad loop -pratical experience | Antenna | |||
| Loop vx Folded Dipole noise factor | Antenna | |||
| loop/dipole | Antenna | |||