On Nov 2, 7:04*am, "Dave" wrote:
"Art Unwin" wrote in message

...

To be frank,, most of this group have asked for a definition of the
term equilibrium,

and which you have never supplied, despite your claim that it has to be
satified for everything.

this despite the fact that there is no law of
physics in this universe * that does not expect the condition of
equilibrium as a a given for the validity of any law with respect to
our universe.

which laws specifically require equilibrium? *any law that talks about
energy transfer, which is most of them, require non-equilibrium. *energy can
not flow where everything is in equilibrium, by definition! *oh, but wait,
you have not supplied that definition yet, so you must have a different
definition in which energy can flow despite equilibrium... lets hear it art,
that is worthy of a Nobel prize for sure!

This is in addition to all suppliers of technical
information to Maxwell to condense into a smaller number, all
specifically stated that the information given were valid ONLY under
the conditions of equilibrium

Give quotes. *i want to see in the original writings where Gauss, Ampere,
Coulomb, Ohm, Lorentz, etc all require some kind of equilibrium. *Come on
art, you claim to be above all of us who have studied such things for years,
and yet you can not define even your most basic condition that you keep
ranting about.

So your homework assignment is to in one equation do this: *Define
Equilibrium.

David,
I am so glad that you keep writing. No I can't spend a lot of time
responding
because of the postings content. What I do find important is that
everybody
exercise to right of free speech as it allows all to determine who
and what you really are
Most people would look at a dictionary for themselves to determine
what the word
equilibrium actually means as well as the recordings of history where
all the masters of the past
has made a stipulation about the conditi9on of equilibrium as a staple
of the validity of the laws that they espoused.
You should also know that Einstein was convinced that radiation held
the clues as to the nature of the four forces of the universe
He never stumbled on the answer but he never ditched the idea of
equilibrium as a staple
for the laws of relativity. Nor have other discarded same in string
theory or the burgeoning science of particles
in our universe. I am betting that there are some knoweledgable people
out there that do read your postings and place you in a certain
category.
I would also point out that those who try to distort the ideas of
reflection are the owners of the largest threads on this newsgroup
where there are many that exceed a thousand posting where many are
unable to turn the espoused ideas of reflections into a closed circuit
of understanding since it involves so many positions that are
unsustainable to those familiar with the state of the art.
All one has to do to destroy my theory and the new clues that emanate
is to add radiators and a time varying current to that enclosed within
a arbitrary border is in a state of equilibrium as per Gauss to
determine the difference in the math to that espoused by Maxwell to
detroy my position. All one has to do is to use any computor program
on antennas with an optimizer, insert any dimensions that do not guide
the computer in the direction of a planar design ie. all dimensions
being non repeatable and then determine why the programs based on the
laws of Maxwell consistently provide antennas that are in a state of
equilibrium. No ham on this group have proved false my assertions with
respect to radiation since their learning stopped at the point of
leaving university where they still hold on to the books of
yesteryear. On top of all this there is no evidence that there is any
advantage in having rafiators in a straight line, or that size is a
factor for any antenna WHERE there is accountability for ALLl the four
forces that aid in the production of radiation.
So David keep writing as I have given you lots of data to refute so
that posters can understand who and what you are .
Great day for antennas so get off the net and enjoy your self
Best regards
Art Unwin KB9MZ........xg