Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Henry Kolesnik" wrote in message ... I know that Hallicrafters made a dual diversity set up and RCA used three AR-88s in a trioka, selecting the best signal with a tone decoder that switched in the best and let the other/s idle or squelched. I've heard that Collins used the R 390 (51J or 51S?) , and Hammarlund the Super Pros ( only 600s or others?). It seems like three antennas spaced about 1000 feet apart on an equilateral triangle was a 100% solution. Did the Brits use it a Bletchley? But I don't see anything these days and have to wonder if diversity reception was made obsolete by SSB or the news & financial services using wire for TTY. I also know that Telstar was the final nail. Was the primary use for RTTY or was it used to voice well as CW? Anyone have some real personal experience to offer? Thanks Hank WD5JFR Years ago at Collins we used a frequency diversity system that sent the same signal on upper and lower sideband. Additional improvement was achieved by delaying one sideband a few milliseconds, then doing the inverse delay at the receiving end. The time delay approach worked well, but never caught on commercially. Additionally, separate antennas were deployed for space diversity. I have forgotten the siting guidelines. The frequency diversity system was used for RTTY, and antenna space diversity for voice/data. |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Wayne wrote:
"The time deay approach werked well, but never caught on commercially." Our receiver selection boxes were made by Crosby or Pioneer if I remember, but it`s been a half century. Best regards, Richard Harrison, KB5WZI |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Richard Harrison" wrote in message ... Wayne wrote: "The time deay approach werked well, but never caught on commercially." Our receiver selection boxes were made by Crosby or Pioneer if I remember, but it`s been a half century. Best regards, Richard Harrison, KB5WZI Heh heh. Yeah, long time. We made our own time delay box under Navy funding. In a prototype, we provided the time delay by recording the RTTY signal on tape and playing it back soon afterwards on a different tape head. The original and delayed were then sent on different sidebands. Noise was simulated with recorded static, and the noise audio was injected at the receiving end before deconstructing the delay with another tape deck. IIRC, we found combinations that gave about a 3-5 db improvement. Fun project that would be even more fun with modern circuitry. |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Wayne wrote:
"In a prototype, we provided the time delay by recording the RTTY signal on a tape and playing it back soon afterwards on a different tape head." That is a technique used to add echo to a recording without a long audio chamber or worse yet springs stretched between transducers. Best regards, Richard Harrison, KB5WZI |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
MW HD time diversity | Shortwave | |||
diversity reception notes | Shortwave | |||
Good discription of diversity reception. | Shortwave | |||
diversity reception notes | Shortwave | |||
Automotive Diversity Reception problems- 98 Corvette | Antenna |