Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#19
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Richard Harrison wrote:
Chris wrote: "I hardly dare say it but, actually that`s incorrect for the radiation field (which is what I wrote about)." That`s chris` prerogative. Note the near field is also called the "induction field". One reason, its energy returns to the source each cycle. The far field emergy has escaped or radiated. Its energy appears as a resistive load on the source. Best regards, Richard Harrison, KB5WZI You mean, those "antenna/rf-magnetic-fields" are NOT leaving the radiator at the speed of light, but being "stored in the ether?", to then collapse and induce an electric field back into the element which first generated-such? sly-grin Sorry, I know, this will be perceived as "troll-territory." :-( Regards, JS |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Standing-Wave Current vs Traveling-Wave Current | Antenna | |||
Standing-Wave Current vs Traveling-Wave Current WAS rraa three-legged race | Antenna | |||
Standing-Wave Current vs Traveling-Wave Current WAS rraa Laugh Riot continues | Antenna | |||
What is displacement current? | Antenna | |||
Will displacement current form a close loop ? | Antenna |