Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#28
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() Art Unwin wrote: Ceci If the surface of a conductor is completely covered by precharged particles and is aprouched by a changing electrical field would it not it be opposed by the electric field pre placed on the surface? The charged particles (electrons) are the carriers of the RF wave. The negative charge of the electrons seems to matter little in the generation and sustaining of RF EM photonic waves since photons are generally assumed to possess neutral charge. However: From PhysicsWeb News: "A physicist in the US has analyzed radio waves from distant galaxies to obtain a new upper bound on the electrical charge of the photon. Brett Altschul of Indiana University has found that the charge is no more than 10^-46 times the charge of the electron — assuming the existence of photons with positive and negative charges. This is 13 orders of magnitude better than the previous direct bound on the charge of a particle that we normally assume to be neutral". -- 73, Cecil http://www.w5dxp.com |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Standing-Wave Current vs Traveling-Wave Current | Antenna | |||
Standing-Wave Current vs Traveling-Wave Current WAS rraa three-legged race | Antenna | |||
Standing-Wave Current vs Traveling-Wave Current WAS rraa Laugh Riot continues | Antenna | |||
What is displacement current? | Antenna | |||
Will displacement current form a close loop ? | Antenna |