Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1   Report Post  
Old November 30th 08, 04:15 PM posted to rec.radio.amateur.antenna
ml ml is offline
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Jul 2006
Posts: 225
Default Lightning Info?

hi

I wondered what would happen if lightning hit my station.
Realize that it's impossible to say exactly but in general i wonder
what the 'step' of failure would be ...

My set up is fairly simple:

I have a few J poles (stainless rods)
some dipoles around 80f some are 10ga some 14
a gps antenna
a fiberglass 900mhz and 1.2g

a 2m and 440 sat eggbeater

most are connected via lmr 400 some lmr600

preamps on the sat are cat 5 fed
one dipole has a sgc tuner fed also via cat5

straight run from roof down a concreate 2x3ft 'shaft' opens on
roof down to elec closet on my floor then into my apt

I have ICE lightning protectors (14story building i am on 4thfl)
almost near where coax enters my apt

they are 'grounded' to the elec ground which I tested and is good as
elec grounds go


typically when weather is bad i unscrew the coax going to the radios
at the ice and leave dangling this creates about a 2ft 'gap'


so assuming a worst case and my roof antennas take a direct hit

what would i theorize would happen?

I suspect the 14g dipole wire would vaporize perhaps also the 10ga

perhaps the jpole might remain?

i suspect the egg beaters would partially vaporize and their baluns
melt

the sgc would fail,

would the coax vaporize at the roof?

would i suspect (distance from roof to ICE @ apt 175ft of coax
) the coax would carry much power measured at my apt end? or
would it vaporize first??

if not would it be absorbed by the concreate walls given the
distance? /arc? by the time it got to my apt?

assuming there would be power down to the ice and given it's
connected to elec ground would anyone suspect they would
dissipate the power to gnd? or just arc over the apt?


any general thoughts as to what might actually happen in this
scenario from both a practical and theoritical would be
appreciated

i always wonder what would be logical to assume in a direct hit
scenario


thanks
  #2   Report Post  
Old November 30th 08, 09:32 PM posted to rec.radio.amateur.antenna
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: May 2007
Posts: 97
Default Lightning Info?


"ml" wrote in message
...
hi

I wondered what would happen if lightning hit my station.
Realize that it's impossible to say exactly but in general i wonder
what the 'step' of failure would be ...


Maybe you should play it safe and use the "Lee Trevino one-iron" lightning
protection club.
I believe it was Lee Trevino who started it - during a thuinderstorm, when
lightning was hitting all around, the golfer pulled a one-iron out of his
bag and held it up high saying that 'even God couldn't hit a one-iron'.
So wrap your coax around a one-iron and hope you've been a good boy.
:-)


  #3   Report Post  
Old December 1st 08, 02:18 AM posted to rec.radio.amateur.antenna
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Jul 2006
Posts: 757
Default Lightning Info?

On Nov 30, 10:15*am, ml wrote:


i always *wonder * what *would be logical to assume * in a *direct *hit *
scenario

thanks


You don't mention what the roof antennas are mounted on.
IE: metal masts, vent pipes, etc?? Well grounded, or not?
If you are depending on the feedlines taking the brunt of the
strike to ground, yes, could be some damage along the way.
I doubt the dipoles would have much trouble, but the J-pole
could well take the strike. Or any other vertical pointy antennas.
That you are grounding at the entry will probably save the
house if you have a good low resistance ground at that point.

But it would be better to have the supporting antenna masts
take the brunt of the strike to ground via good ground wires
or straps if on the roof, or even better, directly planted on the
ground.
You will still have current on the feed lines, but it will be much
less than if they have to carry the whole load.
This is why I've always preferred using a stand alone metal
mast as my support. I'll mount my dipoles slightly lower than
the tip of the mast. Sometimes I'll have ground planes or
verticals on top, but if I do, I always run the coax all the way
down to the base of the mast before leading it to the shack.
I've had two strikes to that mast in the last few years and
had no damage at all. The mast acted as the lightning rod,
and the antennas just floated along for the ride.
I have the coax cables grounded outside the window, and
you can hear an audible arc at the instant of the strike.
So there is current on the lines to ground, but it's not enough
to hurt anything.
But if I used the coax as the only path to ground, I wouldn't
feel near as optimistic it would survive without damage.
And 175 ft is a pretty long path to take if it's not straight
down to ground. You want all those cables snubbed to
ground at a point well before they get to the ICE.
If they dangle from overhead down to the ICE, the potential
will be quite large.


  #4   Report Post  
Old December 2nd 08, 12:03 AM posted to rec.radio.amateur.antenna
ml ml is offline
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Jul 2006
Posts: 225
Default Lightning Info?

In article
,
wrote:

On Nov 30, 10:15*am, ml wrote:


i always *wonder * what *would be logical to assume * in a *direct *hit *
scenario

thanks


You don't mention what the roof antennas are mounted on.
IE: metal masts, vent pipes, etc?? Well grounded, or not?
If you are depending on the feedlines taking the brunt of the
strike to ground, yes, could be some damage along the way.
I doubt the dipoles would have much trouble, but the J-pole
could well take the strike. Or any other vertical pointy antennas.
That you are grounding at the entry will probably save the
house if you have a good low resistance ground at that point.

But it would be better to have the supporting antenna masts
take the brunt of the strike to ground via good ground wires
or straps if on the roof, or even better, directly planted on the
ground.
You will still have current on the feed lines, but it will be much
less than if they have to carry the whole load.
This is why I've always preferred using a stand alone metal
mast as my support. I'll mount my dipoles slightly lower than
the tip of the mast. Sometimes I'll have ground planes or
verticals on top, but if I do, I always run the coax all the way
down to the base of the mast before leading it to the shack.
I've had two strikes to that mast in the last few years and
had no damage at all. The mast acted as the lightning rod,
and the antennas just floated along for the ride.
I have the coax cables grounded outside the window, and
you can hear an audible arc at the instant of the strike.
So there is current on the lines to ground, but it's not enough
to hurt anything.
But if I used the coax as the only path to ground, I wouldn't
feel near as optimistic it would survive without damage.
And 175 ft is a pretty long path to take if it's not straight
down to ground. You want all those cables snubbed to
ground at a point well before they get to the ICE.
If they dangle from overhead down to the ICE, the potential
will be quite large.


hi thanks very much for responding

I should have mentioned that all the antennas are mounted on heavy
ga metal support masts around 10ft and bolted to a brick wall
of the elevator room

i am up 14 stories building wouldn't let me run any wires to
ground on the outside of the building from the roof wish i could

so currently it's just my ice protectors inside my apt on 4th fl
'grounded' to the elec

is't really to much i have access to living in an apt, i'l like
to be able to chip the concreate away inside the elevator room to
get at a beam and clamp onto that but they wouldn't allow that
nor penatrating the room to feed the wire out

there is a electrical box up there i suppose i might be able to
run a small wire from it to the masts not sure if code will
allow using elec conduit in an elevator room as a 'ground ' in
this fashion i suspect not and the inspector is up there
regularly and not sure how much lightning protection that would
afford maybe bleed al little so a smaller hit

i appreciate your sharing the ideas
thanks
  #5   Report Post  
Old December 2nd 08, 05:37 AM posted to rec.radio.amateur.antenna
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Mar 2008
Posts: 56
Default Lightning Info?

On Mon, 01 Dec 2008 19:03:48 -0500, ml wrote:

In article
,
wrote:

On Nov 30, 10:15*am, ml wrote:


i always *wonder * what *would be logical to assume * in a *direct *hit *
scenario

thanks


You don't mention what the roof antennas are mounted on.
IE: metal masts, vent pipes, etc?? Well grounded, or not?
If you are depending on the feedlines taking the brunt of the
strike to ground, yes, could be some damage along the way.
I doubt the dipoles would have much trouble, but the J-pole
could well take the strike. Or any other vertical pointy antennas.
That you are grounding at the entry will probably save the
house if you have a good low resistance ground at that point.

But it would be better to have the supporting antenna masts
take the brunt of the strike to ground via good ground wires
or straps if on the roof, or even better, directly planted on the
ground.
You will still have current on the feed lines, but it will be much
less than if they have to carry the whole load.
This is why I've always preferred using a stand alone metal
mast as my support. I'll mount my dipoles slightly lower than
the tip of the mast. Sometimes I'll have ground planes or
verticals on top, but if I do, I always run the coax all the way
down to the base of the mast before leading it to the shack.
I've had two strikes to that mast in the last few years and
had no damage at all. The mast acted as the lightning rod,
and the antennas just floated along for the ride.
I have the coax cables grounded outside the window, and
you can hear an audible arc at the instant of the strike.
So there is current on the lines to ground, but it's not enough
to hurt anything.
But if I used the coax as the only path to ground, I wouldn't
feel near as optimistic it would survive without damage.
And 175 ft is a pretty long path to take if it's not straight
down to ground. You want all those cables snubbed to
ground at a point well before they get to the ICE.
If they dangle from overhead down to the ICE, the potential
will be quite large.


hi thanks very much for responding

I should have mentioned that all the antennas are mounted on heavy
ga metal support masts around 10ft and bolted to a brick wall
of the elevator room

i am up 14 stories building wouldn't let me run any wires to
ground on the outside of the building from the roof wish i could

so currently it's just my ice protectors inside my apt on 4th fl
'grounded' to the elec


That is not going to cut it. You Must have protection "on the roof"
to comply with code. You need lightning arrestors on each feed line
on the roof.


is't really to much i have access to living in an apt, i'l like
to be able to chip the concreate away inside the elevator room to
get at a beam and clamp onto that but they wouldn't allow that
nor penatrating the room to feed the wire out


They are lack electrical knowledge, so apparently do you.


there is a electrical box up there i suppose i might be able to
run a small wire from it to the masts


Not a small wire, you want just as big at the ground wire to the
electrical box, a small wire will not protect.

not sure if code will
allow using elec conduit in an elevator room as a 'ground ' in
this fashion i suspect not


No it does not meet code, not UBC nor NEC.

and the inspector is up there
regularly and not sure how much lightning protection that would
afford maybe bleed al little so a smaller hit

i appreciate your sharing the ideas
thanks


Get yourself a local person knowledgeable in the field.


  #6   Report Post  
Old December 2nd 08, 08:19 AM posted to rec.radio.amateur.antenna
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Nov 2006
Posts: 2,915
Default Lightning Info?

JosephKK wrote:

...
Get yourself a local person knowledgeable in the field.


Here are my humble thoughts upon this all ... let me warn you, there has
been no extensive testing done, and I live in the central valley of
California--lightening is as rare as diamonds here ...

However, I have run as heavy as #8 wire, fearing protection ...

After much thought, I now have #12, I am sure it will vaporize in a
direct strike (if it ever happens in my lifetime), but those vaporized
particles and molecules will provide a path to ground which the
lightening will continue to follow to complete discharge ... after
which, will need replacing ...

But then, I might have missed something; what are your thoughts?

Warm regards,
JS
Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Getting hit by lightning Kevin Garrett Shortwave 0 August 26th 07 02:53 PM
About lightning etc... Jan Panteltje CB 27 October 15th 05 12:03 AM
? INFO ? Info Tech M-6000 Multi-Mode Code Receiver RHF Shortwave 4 May 10th 05 05:02 AM
Lightning Man! Len Over 21 Policy 2 October 28th 03 03:41 AM
Lightning? IN/IL Ron Hardin Shortwave 2 July 15th 03 09:04 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:27 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017