Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Art wrote:
"So what exactly forces a time varying current to take an alternate route of travel from the center of the conductor when the resistance is so low compared to other routes that could be taken?" Opposing ac current is total impedance, not just resistance. The deepest fibers in a conductor are encircled by the largest number magnetic flux linkages. These create a reactance which generates a counter-emf opposing an imposed current. The deeper the depth inside a conductor, the greater the opposition to the imposed current. Look for "skin effect" in any edition of Terman and you will find diagrams illustrating the various magnetic flux paths inside the conductor which cause skin effect. Best regards, Richard Harrison, KB5WZI |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Dec 9, 3:39*pm, (Richard Harrison) wrote:
Art wrote: "So what exactly forces a time varying current to take an alternate route of travel from the center of the conductor when the resistance is so low compared to other routes that could be taken?" Opposing ac current is total impedance, not just resistance. I tthink you have to go back to the beginning of this thread as again you are talking out of context. My statement referes to the current path on a fractional waqve antenna when it reaches the top. My point was that the current then procedes to the INSIDE of the radiator where the AC current cannot produce an eddy current and thus the opposition to current flow in the centre is just a copper loss i.e.resistance. This statement was made in requesting a possible different current path from the top of the radiator that provided a lower resistive path. I.E I pointed out that the impedance dropped linearly with respect to radiator length and thus I wanted a mathematically demonstrated different path that would counter my initial assertion. The deepest fibers in a conductor are encircled by the largest number magnetic flux linkages. These create a reactance which generates a counter-emf opposing an imposed current. The deeper the depth inside a conductor, the greater the opposition to the imposed current. I think I have stated what skin depth is and what created it many times so I won't respond to the above paragraph Look for "skin effect" in any edition of Terman and you will find diagrams illustrating the various magnetic flux paths inside the conductor which cause skin effect. I believe that the Wilkedia URL and Ian's supplied scanned page is adequate descriptions where the initial supplied current is the sum of the two currents in the circuit one of which is Maxwells determination of displacement current i.e.a current that displaces while providing an accelleration to PARTICLES (charges) from the surface of a radiator. If you can give an specific answer in mathematical form to the initial question asked it would be apreciated Other than that there is no need for continuation of this thread. Best regards, Richard Harrison, KB5WZI |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Art Unwin wrote:
Other than that there is no need for continuation of this thread. There was no need to start it in the first place. -- Jim Pennino Remove .spam.sux to reply. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Serious Skin Care Tips For Women Who Take Their Skin Care Seriously! | Antenna | |||
Standing-Wave Current vs Traveling-Wave Current WAS rraa three-legged race | Antenna | |||
Standing-Wave Current vs Traveling-Wave Current WAS rraa Laugh Riot continues | Antenna | |||
skin depth decay | Antenna |