Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Dec 6, 10:37*am, "Dave" wrote:
"Art Unwin" wrote in message ... the inclusion of the "weak" force required for equilibrium leave it up to art to take a perfectly good premise and insert utter idiocy into it. *next he'll be saying that since the magical levitating weak force neutrinos are jumping off the antenna at an angle to the element that the polarization is caused by them. *how about it art, can you make your levitating neutrinos rotate in different directions with left or right hand circular antennas?? You can have diversity with respect to all polarizations except circular where you only have the choice of one. If you believe that antenna programs are utter idiocy then that will be inline with your general attitude. I am sure that some have taken up my suggestion to check for themselves instead of resorting to knee jerk reactions with out foundation. One more fool like you on this newsgroup changes little Art |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Circular Parasitic | Antenna | |||
Quad and circular polarization | Antenna | |||
Quasi Synchronous?? | Shortwave | |||
Circular V.S. Vertical antenna polarization ! | Broadcasting | |||
circular radiation! | Antenna |