LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #8   Report Post  
Old December 6th 08, 07:50 PM posted to rec.radio.amateur.antenna
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Jul 2006
Posts: 2,951
Default Circular polarization... does it have to be synchronous??

On Sat, 06 Dec 2008 18:46:16 GMT, "Dave" wrote the
lamentations of a weak mind struggling with the high concepts of an
infinitely Byzantine theory from the laboratories of Ærthur:

on the contrary, i believe antenna programs and understand how they work, at
one time i wrote one of my own that did well on designing phased vertical
arrays... and not a single reference to the weak force in it at all!


It is singularly impossible for them to have not included the weak
force - whose total contribution to the resulting -um- results
registers in the 13th digit to the right of the decimal point.
Dismissing this immense revelation is like arguing that a drowning man
is immune from the effects of a drunk ****ing into the ocean.

nor
will you find any of the existing antenna modeling programs that use the
weak force.


op. cit.

which kind of contradicts your whole rant,


That well may be seeing that Ærthur practices a self reinforcing
argument that exhibits that quality of Æquilibrium: damned if you do,
and damned if you do it again.

you say you believe
in the modeling programs and that they give results that agree with your
corrupted weak force model,


A corrupted weak force, the wæk force?

and yet they don't use the weak force at all...


Of course they do (op. cit.)

never have, and never will.


Always has and always will (I already said that didn't I? (which is
what op. cit. mæns in Lat.))

nor can you state where the weak force is
included in Maxwell's equations,


Ærthur, while rooting in the library stacks of an ancient university
located on the banks of a great (but not grand) lake, he discovered
them in the margins (long neglected as flyspecks on the page due to
their singular characteristic out 13 places to the right). Patents
are pænding, so watch your step.

As we are taxpayers, supporting inventors on the dole, it should be
our full right to be able to examine these hidden documents, but
Ærthur continues to suppress their access.

which of course all the modeling programs
are based on. so that just leaves you hanging by your magical equilibrium
levitating diamagnetic neutrinos... which you still haven't explained how
they work with my ferromagnetic radiators.


The only thing he hasn't explained is the beneficial prosperities of
the color of the color-coded wire. Just as all resistors look the
same except for the colors - and we are all perfectly aware that not
all resistors are the same - hence it is a color thing. (Lest we
diverge into the side topic of wæk resistance, aka Unpedance.)

73's
Richard Clark, KB7QHC
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Circular Parasitic Asimov Antenna 22 September 18th 13 09:10 PM
Quad and circular polarization -.-. --.-[_2_] Antenna 26 December 2nd 08 11:18 AM
Quasi Synchronous?? Lucky Shortwave 38 June 10th 05 03:56 AM
Circular V.S. Vertical antenna polarization ! Lex-Lutor Broadcasting 6 March 22nd 05 06:50 PM
circular radiation! [email protected] Antenna 4 August 27th 04 12:53 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:13 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017