Richard:

[snip]
"Richard Clark" wrote in message
...
On Sat, 06 Dec 2008 18:46:16 GMT, "Dave" wrote the
lamentations of a weak mind struggling with the high concepts of an
infinitely Byzantine theory from the laboratories of Ærthur:

on the contrary, i believe antenna programs and understand how they work,
at
one time i wrote one of my own that did well on designing phased vertical
arrays... and not a single reference to the weak force in it at all!
..
..
..
73's
Richard Clark, KB7QHC
[snip]

Hmmmm you guys are just to sceptical of poor Art's "different" biases.

The one eyed man in the land of the blind, indeed.

Have ya'll considered that Art may not be fully occupying our own four-space
and may in fact be operating in several of modern string theory's higher
dimensions.

After all, modern we now know as explained by John Moffat [1], that from the
view of modern Physicists unfettered by actual observation and experiment
that there may be at least 11 of those dimensions available to someone of
Art's calibre and that perhaps... just perhaps, we "flatladers" may not even
be able to comprehend Art's machinations from our own puny four space
viewpoint.

All that said... we've got to get around to viewing emag fields from the
viewpoint of circular components. The universe may well be better
understood when viewed by circular polarization rather than by rectilinear
polarization. No?

[1] John W. Moffat, "Reinventing Gravity", HarperCollins Publishers, New
York, 2008. ISBN: 978-0-06-117088-1. May be found at LC under LCC
QC178.M64 2008.

Cheers!

-- Pete K1PO
-- Indialantic By-the-Sea, FL