Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
J. B. Wood wrote:
I think investing some time with this math (it's not all that difficult) will provide one with insight into the concept of polarization and perhaps head off some misconception. If anyone is interested and has Mathcad, I've got a worksheet that allows one to vary these parameters, plots the resulting ellipse (or circle or line) and also calculates ellipticity (axial ratio) and eccentricity. Sincerely, and 73s from N4GGO, All I have to know is that Circular Polarization always helps when one end of the path is prone to random polarizations, even with the 3 dB power loss. |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Dave:
[snip] "Dave" wrote in message ... J. B. Wood wrote: I think investing some time with this math (it's not all that difficult) will provide one with insight into the concept of polarization and perhaps head off some misconception. If anyone is interested and has Mathcad, I've got a worksheet that allows one to vary these parameters, plots the resulting ellipse (or circle or line) and also calculates ellipticity (axial ratio) and eccentricity. Sincerely, and 73s from N4GGO, All I have to know is that Circular Polarization always helps when one end of the path is prone to random polarizations, even with the 3 dB power loss. [snip] Yep, CP is good! No matter how it is generated... -- Pete K1PO |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Circular Parasitic | Antenna | |||
Quad and circular polarization | Antenna | |||
Quasi Synchronous?? | Shortwave | |||
Circular V.S. Vertical antenna polarization ! | Broadcasting | |||
circular radiation! | Antenna |