LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #21   Report Post  
Old December 8th 08, 05:27 PM posted to rec.radio.amateur.antenna
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Jun 2006
Posts: 1,374
Default Circular polarization... does it have to be synchronous??

christofire wrote:

A source of endless coffee-time debates where I used to work! No, the
current into the rotating dipole would be DC and the means of rotation at
the radio frequency would take the place of the 'transmitter'. If the
current were alternating then the radiated electric field would be
discontinuous but it isn't; it has constant magnitude. Between two such
systems separated by many wavelengths, if there were no anisotropic material
around, reciprocity would apply and a means of conveying DC by radio would
be created!


Now that I think about it, you're right -- the current would have to be
DC, so there would be only DC power into the dipole.

Interesting that you and your co-workers thought of and debated this.
I've given it less than an hour of thought since it popped into my head,
so you've had a lot more time to work out the details. Sounds like it
might work something like I described, then.

However, intriguing and amusing as this analogy might be I wonder if it
really has any practical value. For real mechanical rotating parts the
frequency would be limited to something rather low like the tens of kHz at
which Alexanderson alternators work, and then the wavelength would be so
long that it would probably be impossible to construct an efficient
radiator*. The quickest moving antenna I've encountered was a commutated
plasma antenna, using a construction similar to a 'dekatron' tube, but even
then the length of the radiator was so small that SHF would be needed to
achieve worthwhile radiation efficiency* and the maximum commutation speed
was limited to a few MHz by the time it takes to establish the plasma at
each step in the commutation cycle.


I can't see where this could possibly be of any practical use. For me it
was simply a mind exercise spurred by Peter's musings, resulting from
wondering just how a mechanical system could be made to generate a CP wave.

*(Of course, the conventional principles of radiation resistance vs. loss
resistance may need 'massaging' to bring them into line with the concept of
creating transverse waves by rotating a dipole connected to a battery!)


Indeed. And it seems there wouldn't be any skin effect, then, with only
DC going to the wire. And what about current distribution on the dipole?

Roy Lewallen, W7EL
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Circular Parasitic Asimov Antenna 22 September 18th 13 09:10 PM
Quad and circular polarization -.-. --.-[_2_] Antenna 26 December 2nd 08 11:18 AM
Quasi Synchronous?? Lucky Shortwave 38 June 10th 05 03:56 AM
Circular V.S. Vertical antenna polarization ! Lex-Lutor Broadcasting 6 March 22nd 05 06:50 PM
circular radiation! [email protected] Antenna 4 August 27th 04 12:53 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:18 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017