Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#19
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Roy Lewallen" wrote in message treetonline... christofire wrote: A source of endless coffee-time debates where I used to work! No, the current into the rotating dipole would be DC and the means of rotation at the radio frequency would take the place of the 'transmitter'. If the current were alternating then the radiated electric field would be discontinuous but it isn't; it has constant magnitude. Between two such systems separated by many wavelengths, if there were no anisotropic material around, reciprocity would apply and a means of conveying DC by radio would be created! Now that I think about it, you're right -- the current would have to be DC, so there would be only DC power into the dipole. Interesting that you and your co-workers thought of and debated this. I've given it less than an hour of thought since it popped into my head, so you've had a lot more time to work out the details. Sounds like it might work something like I described, then. However, intriguing and amusing as this analogy might be I wonder if it really has any practical value. For real mechanical rotating parts the frequency would be limited to something rather low like the tens of kHz at which Alexanderson alternators work, and then the wavelength would be so long that it would probably be impossible to construct an efficient radiator*. The quickest moving antenna I've encountered was a commutated plasma antenna, using a construction similar to a 'dekatron' tube, but even then the length of the radiator was so small that SHF would be needed to achieve worthwhile radiation efficiency* and the maximum commutation speed was limited to a few MHz by the time it takes to establish the plasma at each step in the commutation cycle. I can't see where this could possibly be of any practical use. For me it was simply a mind exercise spurred by Peter's musings, resulting from wondering just how a mechanical system could be made to generate a CP wave. *(Of course, the conventional principles of radiation resistance vs. loss resistance may need 'massaging' to bring them into line with the concept of creating transverse waves by rotating a dipole connected to a battery!) Indeed. And it seems there wouldn't be any skin effect, then, with only DC going to the wire. And what about current distribution on the dipole? Roy Lewallen, W7EL Hi Roy I have problems with believing there will be any current in either dipole. What am I missing? Jerry KD6JDJ |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Circular Parasitic | Antenna | |||
Quad and circular polarization | Antenna | |||
Quasi Synchronous?? | Shortwave | |||
Circular V.S. Vertical antenna polarization ! | Broadcasting | |||
circular radiation! | Antenna |