Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Thanks for the idea, John,
Marv John Ferrell wrote: Here is how I do it. There is much more to do but it is operational...No climbing! http://dixienc.us/TiltOverGadget/TiltOverGadget.mht John Ferrell W8CCW On Sat, 06 Dec 2008 13:13:07 -0600, MTV wrote: I'm starting to look for a 55' freestanding tower with house wall bracket. Am undecided on a lattice type or tubular. Being an old geezer I am not interested in the standard lattice type which requires climbing, but a nestable type to be raised and lowered by a crank or motor. I figure if it can be lowered I could work on it from the roof of my one story house. Main antenna would be a Cushcraft A4S 4-element or equivalent - wind area abt 4 sq ft. Not sure I could handle the huge X7 Big Thunder and its 7.9 sq ft., although that would be ideal. Any first hand experience or recommendations? Marv W5MTV |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "MTV" wrote in message ... Thanks for the idea, John, Marv John Ferrell wrote: Here is how I do it. There is much more to do but it is operational...No climbing! http://dixienc.us/TiltOverGadget/TiltOverGadget.mht John Ferrell W8CCW On Sat, 06 Dec 2008 13:13:07 -0600, MTV wrote: I'm starting to look for a 55' freestanding tower with house wall bracket. Am undecided on a lattice type or tubular. Being an old geezer I am not interested in the standard lattice type which requires climbing, but a nestable type to be raised and lowered by a crank or motor. I figure if it can be lowered I could work on it from the roof of my one story house. Main antenna would be a Cushcraft A4S 4-element or equivalent - wind area abt 4 sq ft. Not sure I could handle the huge X7 Big Thunder and its 7.9 sq ft., although that would be ideal. Any first hand experience or recommendations? Marv W5MTV Often helpful to just tilt it back with the antenna pointing up so that it will almost rest on the reflector element. This way you can still reach the driven element and do tuning and testing and feed point assembly. One of the tower manufacturers makes an MA40 tubular (40') with crank up and tilt over come-along arrangement and was very manageable from the ground. I.m sure 55' is available. |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
I have found that the older I get the easier I need things to be!
This scheme I am working with allows one to stand on the ground in the array and do whatever. If I receive adequate warning of a coming ice storm or hurricane it is concievable to lower it all to a position of safety as well. John Ferrell W8CCW On Sun, 07 Dec 2008 16:41:57 GMT, "JB" wrote: Often helpful to just tilt it back with the antenna pointing up so that it will almost rest on the reflector element. This way you can still reach the driven element and do tuning and testing and feed point assembly. One of the tower manufacturers makes an MA40 tubular (40') with crank up and tilt over come-along arrangement and was very manageable from the ground. I.m sure 55' is available. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Use of lattice line to feed dipole | Antenna | |||
Lattice-wound RF choke replacement, 50 years later | Boatanchors | |||
Lattice-wound RF choke replacement, 50 years later | Homebrew | |||
Lattice-wound RF choke replacement, 50 years later | Homebrew | |||
Is Universal Towers (auminum towers) Still in Business ? | Antenna |