Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Dec 7, 5:02*am, "D. Heizinga" wrote:
Experience anyone with this one ? * Imagine a vertical half folded dipole. One side is grounded. Like this: *o *____________________________ * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * l ______________________________l l ground. o = input Drawn laying down but of course it stands upwards. All is a 1/4 lambda long. But now the trick: a coaxial cable can be shorted at the end too. But the lenghts needs only be 0.66 times ! *So 40 metres high becomes only 26 metres. Don't bother the shielding, that is no obstacle for magnetic fields. Can't see much point. Makes more sense to just run a 1/4 wave to me. Sure, the coax has a slower velocity factor than wire, but that's not going to make a 26m antenna show the same performance as a wire 1/4 wave. It will still be a "short" vertical vs the monopole. I'm not sure how the current distribution would be effected. Would need to model it.. But I'm too lazy to mess with it at the moment. :/ BTW, there will be some extra loss in the mix using the coax vs plain wire if you are feeding the center conductor. Much the same as you would see using a coax dipole such as the common "bazooka". Also, there is no advantage to using a folded vertical vs a monopole if avoiding ground losses are the intent. That used to be a fairly common belief that has been pretty much shot out of the water in the last several years. So... Where's the beef? |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|