Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tue, 9 Dec 2008 23:11:10 +0100, "Fred PA0FVH"
wrote: Dear group, As a temporarily solution I would like to use a cheap 5/8, 6/8 or 7/8 WL commercially available CB antenna as a non resonant vertical with elevated radials for use on 10 - 40 meters tuned by an automatic remote ATU at the base of the antenna. I used MMANA and EZNEC (demo) to calculate the expected impedance for the frequency range and found too many results for the height of the antenna. Now I am confused about what to select. Is 5/8WL on 10meters a good height or 8 meter (22')? What I want is a low take off angle on 20 and 30 meters with high efficiency and an impedance which my remote ATU can handle. Hi Fred, 6/8th and 7/8th wavelength at 10M would not have the best low angle charateristic. At the longer wavelengths it should get progressively better (as you may tell from EZNEC demo). 7/8th wavelength at 10M may also be hard to match with your ATU, but worth a try. Shorter antennas for longer wavelengths may find more loss in the ATU than you would care to have, but a 5/8ths at 10M might be the best work-around; and the shortest you should go. 73's Richard Clark, KB7QHC |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hi Guys,
Thanks for your good suggestions. The first thing to understand is that for the most part the CB 5/8, 6/8, 7/8 antennas have nothing to do with the actual height. Manufacturers started claiming these lengths because the CBers believe(d) longer is better The physical length of those antennas available over here are 6.5m, 9.1m and 9.5m. So any height between 6.5m and 9.5m would be possible. It is an alternative for going to a DIY store to get aluminum tubing. The other problem is if the reactive component gets too far for your tuner to handle, but without knowing the tuning range of your tuner, that's hard to know. My remote ATU (Pi matching) has an inductance range from 0 to 63uH and the capacitance ranges from 0 to 6300pF Fred, PA0FVH |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
dentysta
Untrodden developments in unused dental materials proffer patients angelic and tickety-boo alternatives to existing metal based fillings. You puissance be to radically replacement your grin or you power yearn in compensation to induce rid of an horrible metal filling. Whatever your requirements, we enjoy tough imaging systems linked to digital cameras where we can simulate (gabinet dentystyczny) what contrastive treatments on look like in your mouth. |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
stomatolog
Clear-sighted to developments in new dental materials forth patients right-minded and ok on holiday alternatives to existing metal based fillings. You eminence net to radically novelty your grin or you energy feel nostalgia pro to classify rid of an unprepossessing metal filling. Whatever your requirements, we from powerful imaging systems linked to digital cameras where we can simulate (gabinet dentystyczny) what discrete treatments motivation look like in your mouth. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Got my vertical resonant on 160 | Shortwave | |||
The Long and Thin Vertical Loop Antenna. [ The Non-Resonance Vertical with a Difference ] | Shortwave | |||
Resonant and Non-resonant Radials | Antenna | |||
AH-4 vs. AT-180 w/resonant antenna | Antenna | |||
RESONANT ANTENNAS | Antenna |