You are aware that many of the DTV signal are UHF band? Right?


gain - I'm within 5 miles of most local stations, and within 20 miles
of a
couple more.)

JB wrote:

...
Because the bad women get you into fights, jail, divorce court and strip you
of your wealth so you wind up paying for their parties while they line up
new suckers and try to shame you for not making their fantasies more
complete.

Remember their kind of bad is much worse than we give them credit for.

Case in point: Last one had the fantasy that a husband should be willing to
die for her. Made her heart go pitter-patter. Thought of men as some kind
of pet or other species. I told her to go buy a Doberman.

I find it takes a exhaustive baby-sitting type of investigation of at least
2 years before they let their hair down and show you their true mind.


From past experience, I have to give it to you, there is much truth
there ...

Regards,
JS

"John Smith" wrote in message
...
JB wrote:

...
Because the bad women get you into fights, jail, divorce court and strip
you
of your wealth so you wind up paying for their parties while they line
up
new suckers and try to shame you for not making their fantasies more
complete.

Remember their kind of bad is much worse than we give them credit for.

Case in point: Last one had the fantasy that a husband should be
willing to
die for her. Made her heart go pitter-patter. Thought of men as some
kind
of pet or other species. I told her to go buy a Doberman.

I find it takes a exhaustive baby-sitting type of investigation of at
least
2 years before they let their hair down and show you their true mind.


From past experience, I have to give it to you, there is much truth
there ...

Regards,
JS

It looks like marriage is a forgone conclusion in California anyway. I
don't know why the fags want it. I guess they don't reproduce so they have
to steal someone else's kids. It's all beginning to look like reruns of
daytime TV.

What the church should do is Holy Matrimony and quit recognizing the state.

Beware the conspiracy. The problem is that so many people don't even
believe their own experience. let alone what they see happening to others.
"Oh, that won't happen to me." Their brains are too full of slogans that
tell them how to feel and what to say, that they can't make rational
conclusions.

The answer: A Christ centered boot camp that turns marriage partners into
accountability partners in a team effort rather than a Detante.

JB wrote:

...
It looks like marriage is a forgone conclusion in California anyway. I
don't know why the fags want it. I guess they don't reproduce so they have
to steal someone else's kids. It's all beginning to look like reruns of
daytime TV.

What the church should do is Holy Matrimony and quit recognizing the state.

Beware the conspiracy. The problem is that so many people don't even
believe their own experience. let alone what they see happening to others.
"Oh, that won't happen to me." Their brains are too full of slogans that
tell them how to feel and what to say, that they can't make rational
conclusions.

The answer: A Christ centered boot camp that turns marriage partners into
accountability partners in a team effort rather than a Detante.


I would like to know when the state/feds took over marriage, why and how
they are able to do it with NO justification. Marriage is a God/Church
thing ...

The same fags which demand they be able to marry will demand separation
of church and state powers; So, where is that separation here. Gov't
needs to back off ... only God and the Church has the power to
rightfully marry people--all other marriages are a fraud anyway.

Regards,
JS

"John Smith" wrote in message
...
JB wrote:

...
It looks like marriage is a forgone conclusion in California anyway. I
don't know why the fags want it. I guess they don't reproduce so they
have
to steal someone else's kids. It's all beginning to look like reruns of
daytime TV.

What the church should do is Holy Matrimony and quit recognizing the
state.

Beware the conspiracy. The problem is that so many people don't even
believe their own experience. let alone what they see happening to
others.
"Oh, that won't happen to me." Their brains are too full of slogans
that
tell them how to feel and what to say, that they can't make rational
conclusions.

The answer: A Christ centered boot camp that turns marriage partners
into
accountability partners in a team effort rather than a Detante.


I would like to know when the state/feds took over marriage, why and how
they are able to do it with NO justification. Marriage is a God/Church
thing ...

The same fags which demand they be able to marry will demand separation
of church and state powers; So, where is that separation here. Gov't
needs to back off ... only God and the Church has the power to
rightfully marry people--all other marriages are a fraud anyway.

Regards,
JS

First off, "separation of church and state" is cited nowhere in The
Constitution, neither does "freedom from religion." In fact, First
Amendment was placed that no particular denomination would be made the
official religion of The State. But not only would a belief in God be
respected, but considered necessary and in fact, God is cited as the primary
justification for the very existence of, and the authority of, The State.
When The State kills off God, then it usurps it's own authority.

AFAIK marriage was mostly a registration thing to start with, then it
progressed to further regulation and intervention "for the sake of the
children" as in rh factor typing, and tax credit, then on to legal authority
in breaking up families and assigning child support and custody which has
now become a complete Socialist joke since they have been awarding adoption
and custody of even same sex children to gays so they can "indoctrinate"
which really means "grooming" or preparing for rape by force, intimidation
or bamboozle. They may claim they aren't really child moles_rs, but how can
you believe that when someone aggressively promotes "lust of the flesh" or
"sexual gratification" as an alternative to God's way. If it were only
about LOVE there wouldn't be a discussion because in the end we would be
brothers and sisters in heaven, not Plaintiff and Defendant, Gay or
Straight, so as a people we seem to be "delivered over to a reprobate mind"
and our government is only a reflection of that.

The sickest argument put forth is the "Scientific" argument, that it is only
natural. But that argument works as well for even cannibalism, since it
occurs in nature too. So what separates us from being animals?

The real enemy after all is the Devil. He is International and infiltrates
anywhere he finds an empty thought.

JB wrote:
"John Smith" wrote in message
...
JB wrote:

...
It looks like marriage is a forgone conclusion in California anyway. I
don't know why the fags want it. I guess they don't reproduce so they
have
to steal someone else's kids. It's all beginning to look like reruns of
daytime TV.

What the church should do is Holy Matrimony and quit recognizing the
state.
Beware the conspiracy. The problem is that so many people don't even
believe their own experience. let alone what they see happening to
others.
"Oh, that won't happen to me." Their brains are too full of slogans
that
tell them how to feel and what to say, that they can't make rational
conclusions.

The answer: A Christ centered boot camp that turns marriage partners
into
accountability partners in a team effort rather than a Detante.

I would like to know when the state/feds took over marriage, why and how
they are able to do it with NO justification. Marriage is a God/Church
thing ...

The same fags which demand they be able to marry will demand separation
of church and state powers; So, where is that separation here. Gov't
needs to back off ... only God and the Church has the power to
rightfully marry people--all other marriages are a fraud anyway.

Regards,
JS

First off, "separation of church and state" is cited nowhere in The
Constitution, neither does "freedom from religion." In fact, First
Amendment was placed that no particular denomination would be made the
official religion of The State. But not only would a belief in God be
respected, but considered necessary and in fact, God is cited as the primary
justification for the very existence of, and the authority of, The State.
When The State kills off God, then it usurps it's own authority.

AFAIK marriage was mostly a registration thing to start with, then it
progressed to further regulation and intervention "for the sake of the
children" as in rh factor typing, and tax credit, then on to legal authority
in breaking up families and assigning child support and custody which has
now become a complete Socialist joke since they have been awarding adoption
and custody of even same sex children to gays so they can "indoctrinate"
which really means "grooming" or preparing for rape by force, intimidation
or bamboozle. They may claim they aren't really child moles_rs, but how can
you believe that when someone aggressively promotes "lust of the flesh" or
"sexual gratification" as an alternative to God's way. If it were only
about LOVE there wouldn't be a discussion because in the end we would be
brothers and sisters in heaven, not Plaintiff and Defendant, Gay or
Straight, so as a people we seem to be "delivered over to a reprobate mind"
and our government is only a reflection of that.

The sickest argument put forth is the "Scientific" argument, that it is only
natural. But that argument works as well for even cannibalism, since it
occurs in nature too. So what separates us from being animals?

The real enemy after all is the Devil. He is International and infiltrates
anywhere he finds an empty thought.


Get help, JB. You can say all this stuff in some of the more psychotic
churches in this country and maybe get some people to think you're wise
and prophetic, but this is a forum for antennas, not the evils of
consorting with devil-worshiping Thai ladyboys. On this forum, you're
simply making a paranoid old fool of yourself.
Hope you get well, soon,
73,
Tom Donaly, KA6RUH

JB wrote:

...
First off, "separation of church and state" is cited nowhere in The
Constitution, neither does "freedom from religion." In fact, First
Amendment was placed that no particular denomination would be made the
official religion of The State. But not only would a belief in God be
respected, but considered necessary and in fact, God is cited as the primary
justification for the very existence of, and the authority of, The State.
When The State kills off God, then it usurps it's own authority.


Absolutely, however, I think it is blatantly implied, the separation(s.)
Those who do not believe in an intelligence which created all this,
ask me to believe that you can take a handful of wood, glass, plastic,
etc. toss it into a mud-puddle, come back a few million years later and
begin digging up microwaves, cellphones, TVs', radios, etc.; And, they
laugh at me for believing a thinking mind had a hand in all this! Go
figure ...

AFAIK marriage was mostly a registration thing to start with, then it
progressed to further regulation and intervention "for the sake of the
children" as in rh factor typing, and tax credit, then on to legal authority
in breaking up families and assigning child support and custody which has
now become a complete Socialist joke since they have been awarding adoption
and custody of even same sex children to gays so they can "indoctrinate"
which really means "grooming" or preparing for rape by force, intimidation
or bamboozle. They may claim they aren't really child moles_rs, but how can
you believe that when someone aggressively promotes "lust of the flesh" or
"sexual gratification" as an alternative to God's way. If it were only
about LOVE there wouldn't be a discussion because in the end we would be
brothers and sisters in heaven, not Plaintiff and Defendant, Gay or
Straight, so as a people we seem to be "delivered over to a reprobate mind"
and our government is only a reflection of that.

Yeah, a look back though history provides all sorts of weird things.
Like, the king decided who could and could not marry, had dibs on having
sex with the bride first, etc. Like I said, gov't has no place in
religious affairs--end-of-story.


The sickest argument put forth is the "Scientific" argument, that it is only
natural. But that argument works as well for even cannibalism, since it
occurs in nature too. So what separates us from being animals?

It looks pretty natural to me. Not only that, but it is the only way to
have a stable society where there the children are well taken care of.
But, your logic evades me; Can a dog behave any other way than as a
dog? A cat? A bird? A mouse? Etc ...


The real enemy after all is the Devil. He is International and infiltrates
anywhere he finds an empty thought.


The bible brings us stories of another race(s) which are not benign to
the human race. If these stories are true, or not, I do not know. I do
know that behind any "myth", there is always a grain of truth ...
ancient books from India, written on palm leaves bring us stories to
rival Buck Rogers, spacecraft and wars in and out of our atmosphere--I
find it strange that ancient people had such a strong affinity for
science fiction ... it actually boggles my mind; I wonder ...

However, I do not hold any to my own thoughts, or open-mind. And, we
waste a thread which follows the intent of antennas a whole lot more
than our meanderings of mind ... I must make this the end of my story.
Again, if we would agree, I would be bored ... thanks for not boring me.
:-)

Warm regards,
JS


JS

Tom Donaly wrote:

...
Get help, JB. You can say all this stuff in some of the more psychotic
churches in this country and maybe get some people to think you're wise
and prophetic, but this is a forum for antennas, not the evils of
consorting with devil-worshiping Thai ladyboys. On this forum, you're
simply making a paranoid old fool of yourself.
Hope you get well, soon,
73,
Tom Donaly, KA6RUH

Tom:

Excuse us for having a bit of fun, but the subject matter grew boring
and we just had a bit of a side chat ... no harm met.

Regards,
JS

Bart Bailey wrote:

...
It regains it's own authority.

There is much truth there. It seems humans are constructed with a need
to worship "something." In the absence of a loving God, we get a stern
and vengeful state ... wait and see.

Regards,
JS

Bart Bailey wrote:

...
Get the state out of religious affairs!
IOW: No tax breaks for the existence of some religious condition, like
marriage, nor for property ownership by some city's infrastructure
loading church either.

Actually, strange thinking, IMHO.

No gov't has the right to tax God, ROFLOL! But, it is interesting to
watch ...

Regards,
JS