Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article ,
John Smith wrote: Telamon wrote: ... Yeah but we don't care about transmitting goofball, we care about receiving and so that statement "A random wire (e.g. inverted L) transmits nicely if you use a tuner at the feed point" by Dave is relevant where you are not. You ridiculous fool. You are the most complete brain dead example of a sub-human which has ever been presented to me ... You dumb twit. We don't care about transmitting. Receiving is EQUALLY as important as the transmitting element in the above. Again you dumb twit, we don't care about transmitting. Or, to explain it to the necessary point, for a mental midget, such as yourself: "If the signal being transmitted is low power, or there are bad conditions, and, perhaps, the guy is in Australia, I'd better have the "best" antenna possible. However, if I am receiving the "50,000 watt atmosphere burner", 50 miles away, a rusty coat-hanger, most likely, would work ..." You are one funny guy I'll give you that. However, you mileage may vary with you "magical antenna logic!" grin The only magic around here is spouted by you. Your experience is "magically" different than anyone else's and your antenna theory is simplistic at best not to mention the great job you do of putting words in peoples mouthes never spoken but what else can we expect from the comprehension impaired. I'll tell you what is "magical" and that's the conversations you seem to have in your head before you post. You hit me as a guy attempting to pass off "magical physics" to kindergarten-ers; but then, even that is, most likely, a challenge for you ... sad, so very, very sad ... :-( Yeah, very sad of you to keep plonking and then continue to read me. What a goofball. -- Telamon Ventura, California |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() You ridiculous fool. You are the most complete brain dead example of a sub-human which has ever been presented to me ... You dumb twit. We don't care about transmitting. We don't...? Receiving is EQUALLY as important as the transmitting element in the above. Again you dumb twit, we don't care about transmitting. We don't...? Yeah, very sad of you to keep plonking and then continue to read me. I thought this was your trick? What a goofball. Takes one to know one. |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
RP wrote:
You ridiculous fool. You are the most complete brain dead example of a sub-human which has ever been presented to me ... You dumb twit. We don't care about transmitting. We don't...? Receiving is EQUALLY as important as the transmitting element in the above. Again you dumb twit, we don't care about transmitting. We don't...? Yeah, very sad of you to keep plonking and then continue to read me. I thought this was your trick? What a goofball. Takes one to know one. Hey, telemundo is a great man, in his own mind, leave him alone ... humor here is sparse, he provides for a needed demand ... :-) Regards, JS |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article ,
John Smith wrote: RP wrote: You ridiculous fool. You are the most complete brain dead example of a sub-human which has ever been presented to me ... You dumb twit. We don't care about transmitting. We don't...? Receiving is EQUALLY as important as the transmitting element in the above. Again you dumb twit, we don't care about transmitting. We don't...? Yeah, very sad of you to keep plonking and then continue to read me. I thought this was your trick? What a goofball. Takes one to know one. Hey, telemundo is a great man, in his own mind, leave him alone ... humor here is sparse, he provides for a needed demand ... :-) You are just a comprehension impaired fool that talks to himself. How you doing today? Have any nice conversations with yourself you would like to share with the newsgroup? -- Telamon Ventura, California |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article ,
John Smith wrote: RP wrote: You ridiculous fool. You are the most complete brain dead example of a sub-human which has ever been presented to me ... You dumb twit. We don't care about transmitting. We don't...? Receiving is EQUALLY as important as the transmitting element in the above. Again you dumb twit, we don't care about transmitting. We don't...? Yeah, very sad of you to keep plonking and then continue to read me. I thought this was your trick? What a goofball. Takes one to know one. Hey, telemundo is a great man, in his own mind, leave him alone ... humor here is sparse, he provides for a needed demand ... :-) For entertainment we defer to the anonymous Mr. Assembly-wizard and his cowardly anonymous side kick RP. -- Telamon Ventura, California |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article ,
"RP" wrote: You ridiculous fool. You are the most complete brain dead example of a sub-human which has ever been presented to me ... You dumb twit. We don't care about transmitting. We don't...? Yeah we don't. This was posted in the shortwave group and cross posted to the amateur group. Receiving is EQUALLY as important as the transmitting element in the above. Again you dumb twit, we don't care about transmitting. We don't...? Yes we don't care. Yeah, very sad of you to keep plonking and then continue to read me. I thought this was your trick? No not mine although filters do get turned off from time to time for various reasons. What a goofball. Takes one to know one. And that make you one now doesn't it. -- Telamon Ventura, California |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Poor to no shortwave Reception | Shortwave | |||
Should a shortwave loop antenna, hung outside, also improve FM reception? | Shortwave | |||
The "Green" Antenna for AM/MW Radio Reception plus Shortwave Too ! | Shortwave | |||
Sangean ATS-505 Receiver - Improving your Shortwave Radio Reception with an External Shortwave Listener's (SWL) Antenna | Shortwave | |||
shortwave reception.. with Grundig YB 400 PE | Shortwave |