Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1   Report Post  
Old December 29th 08, 04:12 AM posted to rec.radio.shortwave,rec.radio.amateur.antenna
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Jul 2006
Posts: 4,494
Default Shortwave Radio Listener (SWL) Antennas -versus- Amateur Radio Antennas

In article ,
John Smith wrote:

Telamon wrote:

...
Yeah but we don't care about transmitting goofball, we care about
receiving and so that statement "A random wire (e.g. inverted L)
transmits nicely if you use a tuner at the feed point" by Dave is
relevant where you are not.


You ridiculous fool. You are the most complete brain dead example of a
sub-human which has ever been presented to me ...


You dumb twit. We don't care about transmitting.

Receiving is EQUALLY as important as the transmitting element in the
above.


Again you dumb twit, we don't care about transmitting.

Or, to explain it to the necessary point, for a mental midget, such
as yourself: "If the signal being transmitted is low power, or there
are bad conditions, and, perhaps, the guy is in Australia, I'd better
have the "best" antenna possible. However, if I am receiving the
"50,000 watt atmosphere burner", 50 miles away, a rusty coat-hanger,
most likely, would work ..."


You are one funny guy I'll give you that.

However, you mileage may vary with you "magical antenna logic!" grin


The only magic around here is spouted by you. Your experience is
"magically" different than anyone else's and your antenna theory is
simplistic at best not to mention the great job you do of putting words
in peoples mouthes never spoken but what else can we expect from the
comprehension impaired.

I'll tell you what is "magical" and that's the conversations you seem to
have in your head before you post.

You hit me as a guy attempting to pass off "magical physics" to
kindergarten-ers; but then, even that is, most likely, a challenge for
you ... sad, so very, very sad ... :-(


Yeah, very sad of you to keep plonking and then continue to read me.

What a goofball.

--
Telamon
Ventura, California
  #2   Report Post  
Old December 30th 08, 07:26 PM posted to rec.radio.shortwave,rec.radio.amateur.antenna
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Jul 2008
Posts: 11
Default Shortwave Radio Listener (SWL) Antennas -versus- Amateur Radio Antennas


You ridiculous fool. You are the most complete brain dead example of a
sub-human which has ever been presented to me ...


You dumb twit. We don't care about transmitting.


We don't...?

Receiving is EQUALLY as important as the transmitting element in the
above.


Again you dumb twit, we don't care about transmitting.


We don't...?

Yeah, very sad of you to keep plonking and then continue to read me.


I thought this was your trick?

What a goofball.


Takes one to know one.


  #3   Report Post  
Old December 31st 08, 02:26 AM posted to rec.radio.shortwave,rec.radio.amateur.antenna
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Nov 2006
Posts: 2,915
Default Shortwave Radio Listener (SWL) Antennas -versus- Amateur RadioAntennas

RP wrote:
You ridiculous fool. You are the most complete brain dead example of a
sub-human which has ever been presented to me ...

You dumb twit. We don't care about transmitting.


We don't...?

Receiving is EQUALLY as important as the transmitting element in the
above.

Again you dumb twit, we don't care about transmitting.


We don't...?

Yeah, very sad of you to keep plonking and then continue to read me.


I thought this was your trick?

What a goofball.


Takes one to know one.



Hey, telemundo is a great man, in his own mind, leave him alone ...
humor here is sparse, he provides for a needed demand ... :-)

Regards,
JS
  #4   Report Post  
Old December 31st 08, 09:54 PM posted to rec.radio.shortwave,rec.radio.amateur.antenna
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Jul 2006
Posts: 4,494
Default Shortwave Radio Listener (SWL) Antennas -versus- Amateur Radio Antennas

In article ,
John Smith wrote:

RP wrote:
You ridiculous fool. You are the most complete brain dead example of a
sub-human which has ever been presented to me ...
You dumb twit. We don't care about transmitting.


We don't...?

Receiving is EQUALLY as important as the transmitting element in the
above.
Again you dumb twit, we don't care about transmitting.


We don't...?

Yeah, very sad of you to keep plonking and then continue to read me.


I thought this was your trick?

What a goofball.


Takes one to know one.



Hey, telemundo is a great man, in his own mind, leave him alone ...
humor here is sparse, he provides for a needed demand ... :-)


You are just a comprehension impaired fool that talks to himself. How
you doing today? Have any nice conversations with yourself you would
like to share with the newsgroup?

--
Telamon
Ventura, California
  #5   Report Post  
Old December 31st 08, 10:13 PM posted to rec.radio.shortwave,rec.radio.amateur.antenna
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Jul 2006
Posts: 4,494
Default Shortwave Radio Listener (SWL) Antennas -versus- Amateur Radio Antennas

In article ,
John Smith wrote:

RP wrote:
You ridiculous fool. You are the most complete brain dead example of a
sub-human which has ever been presented to me ...
You dumb twit. We don't care about transmitting.


We don't...?

Receiving is EQUALLY as important as the transmitting element in the
above.
Again you dumb twit, we don't care about transmitting.


We don't...?

Yeah, very sad of you to keep plonking and then continue to read me.


I thought this was your trick?

What a goofball.


Takes one to know one.



Hey, telemundo is a great man, in his own mind, leave him alone ...
humor here is sparse, he provides for a needed demand ... :-)



For entertainment we defer to the anonymous Mr. Assembly-wizard and his
cowardly anonymous side kick RP.

--
Telamon
Ventura, California


  #6   Report Post  
Old December 31st 08, 09:51 PM posted to rec.radio.shortwave,rec.radio.amateur.antenna
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Jul 2006
Posts: 4,494
Default Shortwave Radio Listener (SWL) Antennas -versus- Amateur Radio Antennas

In article ,
"RP" wrote:

You ridiculous fool. You are the most complete brain dead example of a
sub-human which has ever been presented to me ...


You dumb twit. We don't care about transmitting.


We don't...?


Yeah we don't. This was posted in the shortwave group and cross posted
to the amateur group.

Receiving is EQUALLY as important as the transmitting element in the
above.


Again you dumb twit, we don't care about transmitting.


We don't...?


Yes we don't care.

Yeah, very sad of you to keep plonking and then continue to read me.


I thought this was your trick?


No not mine although filters do get turned off from time to time for
various reasons.

What a goofball.


Takes one to know one.


And that make you one now doesn't it.

--
Telamon
Ventura, California
Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Poor to no shortwave Reception David Mills Shortwave 2 December 18th 07 05:54 PM
Should a shortwave loop antenna, hung outside, also improve FM reception? dead of night Shortwave 0 January 23rd 07 12:05 AM
The "Green" Antenna for AM/MW Radio Reception plus Shortwave Too ! RHF Shortwave 0 January 10th 07 01:21 PM
Sangean ATS-505 Receiver - Improving your Shortwave Radio Reception with an External Shortwave Listener's (SWL) Antenna RHF Shortwave 0 January 16th 06 09:12 PM
shortwave reception.. with Grundig YB 400 PE David Mills Shortwave 4 May 18th 04 06:58 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:43 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017