"Art Unwin" wrote in message
...
Using just one example radiation
at present is presumed to provide many waves along a conductor purely
on the bases that current is reflected from the antenna end and
progresses along the same path that it arrived. This error alone has
allowed many assumptions and erronious theories to be expanded.

oh no! now he doesn't believe in reflections! how could we ever survive on
here without endless discussions of reflections and waves?

oh no! *now he doesn't believe in reflections! *how could we ever survive on
here without endless discussions of reflections and waves?

He believes that anything that trashes his delusions of how an antenna
works has to be wrong.

Jimmie

On Dec 29, 2:27*pm, JIMMIE wrote:
oh no! *now he doesn't believe in reflections! *how could we ever survive on
here without endless discussions of reflections and waves?

He believes that anything that trashes his delusions of how an antenna
works has to be wrong.

Jimmie

Enough of the talking Jimmie and prove the Gaussian equation
transformation is wrong.
You missed your chance when it was shown on the net. My earlier
posting pointed you
to a place so you can handle the CGS units and trash it if you can.
All those posts you
have wasted would not have been necessary if you had educated yourself
in the mean time
instead of becoming just a talking head
Art