Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Dec 28, 4:12*pm, (Richard Harrison)
wrote: Art wrote: "We can then use the absolute standard equation of E = I R." For ac (RF) that`s not true. The formula is E=IZ, where Z includes reactance and resistance in quadrature. I`m not piling on but some readers may believe Art. * Best regards, Ricxhard Harrison, KB5WZI Yes you are correct but the original equation was E=IR which preceeds the implication of impedance which is a derivative of my equation and came about with the addition of A.C. technology. If the impedance is totally resistive then my statement is not untrue Now to avoid the nitpicking are you saying that E=IZ cannot be used for calculations at the end of an antenna and if so" WHY " Art |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Balanced transmission lines in a progressive wave regime. 'Cos seeingis believing! | Antenna | |||
Balanced transmission lines in a progressive wave regime. 'Cos seeingis believing! | Equipment | |||
series circuit for fractional WL antennas | Antenna | |||
Why are hi-Z transmission lines low loss? | Antenna | |||
parallel transmission lines | Antenna |