Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Dec 28, 3:32*pm, Roy Lewallen wrote:
The "Method of Moments" (MOM) makes no assumptions about current distribution on a radiator; *it computes the current distribution. The radiated field is then calculated based on the current distribution.. Frank Exactly correct. EZNEC (including demo) users can get a good illustration of this by looking at the pattern from the example file Cardioid.ez which consists of two identical elements with perfect spacing and perfectly ratioed base currents. Notice that the front/back ratio is about 35 dB (dropping to about 31 dB with more segments for more accurate results), while it should be essentially infinite. The small back lobe is caused by modification of the current distribution on the two elements caused by mutual coupling -- although the base currents are perfectly equal in magnitude and 90 degrees out of phase, the fields from the two elements aren't, due to their having slightly different current distributions. When I first saw this back lobe with perfectly ratioed base currents, I searched through the program code looking for what I was certain was a bug. I finally realized that the result was correct and that the lobe was caused by the altered current distribution which the program had correctly calculated. For more about this, seehttp://eznec.com/Amateur/Articles/Current_Dist.pdf. The assumption of sinusoidal current distribution is strictly true only with straight, isolated conductors which are infinitely thin, although it's a reasonably good assumption in many other cases. Mathematical analyses of antennas done before computers were pretty much limited to cases where sinusoidal distribution was assumed, because a more accurate determination of current distribution was virtually impossible to calculate. The ability to determine the actual current distribution is one of the very important advantages of computer analysis. Roy Lewallen, W7EL If current distribution is calculated correctly as stated then the answer with respect to the route taken of the current of a fractional wave antenna should be available and beyond doubt as the program is derived from Maxwells laws. The distributed current should be DC based if current flow is thru the center of the radiator. As far as the resistance encountered on reverse flow on the outside of a radiator the figure provided by computor programs should be rather interesting as I have never encountered in print suggested figures. In accordance with some engineers the radiation resistance but be stated as the radiation impedance to avoid sniping Art |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Balanced transmission lines in a progressive wave regime. 'Cos seeingis believing! | Antenna | |||
Balanced transmission lines in a progressive wave regime. 'Cos seeingis believing! | Equipment | |||
series circuit for fractional WL antennas | Antenna | |||
Why are hi-Z transmission lines low loss? | Antenna | |||
parallel transmission lines | Antenna |