Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#13
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Dec 28, 5:35*pm, (Richard Harrison)
wrote: Art wrote: "Now to avoid nitpicking are you saying that E=IZ cannot be used for calculations at the end of an antenna and if so "WHY"?" It is complicated by multiple currents. Like an open-circuited transmission line, electrical conduction stops at the end of the conductor. Current then becomes a phasor problem. Collapse of conduction current induces a voltage which combined with the incident voltage almost doubles the total voltage at this spot in many cases. This reverses the direction of current in the conductor. Due to capacitance at his high-voltage spot with the iniverse, displacement current flows into free space from open-circuited antenna ends. It is usually smaller than the conduction current. Best regards, Richard Harrison, KB5WZI You skated over the difference between an open circuit of the transmission line compared to the end of an antenna. The analogy is flawed and will be shown when the resistance in the center of a radiator is disclosed via the computor programs. You never did supply the information needed to justify the values of E,I and R when the current value crosses the zero line on a graph. You can ofcourse, declare that none of the given factors can ever be equal to zero by jumping the datum line !!!!! By the way, could you state a situation where the displacement current is LARGER than the conduction current so I may review it in the light of Newtonian laws? Art Art |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Balanced transmission lines in a progressive wave regime. 'Cos seeingis believing! | Antenna | |||
Balanced transmission lines in a progressive wave regime. 'Cos seeingis believing! | Equipment | |||
series circuit for fractional WL antennas | Antenna | |||
Why are hi-Z transmission lines low loss? | Antenna | |||
parallel transmission lines | Antenna |