Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#13
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article , Roy
Lewallen wrote: The assumption of sinusoidal current distribution is strictly true only with straight, isolated conductors which are infinitely thin, although it's a reasonably good assumption in many other cases. Mathematical analyses of antennas done before computers were pretty much limited to cases where sinusoidal distribution was assumed, because a more accurate determination of current distribution was virtually impossible to calculate. The ability to determine the actual current distribution is one of the very important advantages of computer analysis. Roy Lewallen, W7EL Hello, Roy, and while the above is certainly correct, you're probably wasting your time. Many folks like to fashion their own "reasonable" explanations even when they're completely off track (should I mention the CFA again?). Of course they're always right and it's the rest of the world who's wrong. Certain folks on this ng appear to be in constant need of validation. Persons without some knowledge of the underlying physics and applied math are destined to reach the wrong conclusions IMO. Of course that's not going to stop some from building a CFA because as we all know it's the standard comms antenna used at the Groom Lake facility to keep in touch with Klaatu. Sincerely, and 73s from N4GGO, John Wood (Code 5550) e-mail: Naval Research Laboratory 4555 Overlook Avenue, SW Washington, DC 20375-5337 |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Balanced transmission lines in a progressive wave regime. 'Cos seeingis believing! | Antenna | |||
Balanced transmission lines in a progressive wave regime. 'Cos seeingis believing! | Equipment | |||
series circuit for fractional WL antennas | Antenna | |||
Why are hi-Z transmission lines low loss? | Antenna | |||
parallel transmission lines | Antenna |