"Art Unwin" wrote in message
...

Wrong.!

I told you so!

The primary current is still flowing at the center. Particles occupy
the surface of the inside
and with the inter rejection of like particles produce a hoop stress

'hoop stress' now there's a good term for particle interaction!

between them which
cannot be broken by a eddy current field, if present Thus the
particles cannot be ejected even tho there
is the primary ,current flow in the center ofr the tube. Remember.
the presence of particles is cast in stone

the stone in this case is art's brain.

via the extension of the Gaussian law of statics. The presumption that
the current is near zero
is false until proven otherwise.. There is absolutely NO evidence that
reflection occurs in any shape or form at the
material ends of a radiator and all that pertains to such. PERIOD

nah, just because i can measure it with my simple tdr here doesn't mean it
happens... its all the magical mystery levitating neutrinos that cause all
the fun.

On Jan 3, 11:00*am, "Dave" wrote:
"Art Unwin" wrote in message

...

Wrong.!

I told you so!

The primary current is still flowing at the center. Particles occupy
the surface of the inside
and with the inter rejection of like particles produce a hoop stress

'hoop stress' *now there's a good term for particle interaction!

between them which
cannot be broken by a *eddy current field, if present *Thus the
particles cannot be ejected even tho there
is the primary ,current flow in the center ofr the tube. Remember.
the presence of particles is cast in stone

the stone in this case is art's brain.

via the extension of the Gaussian law of statics. The presumption that
the current is near zero
is false until proven otherwise.. There is absolutely NO evidence that
reflection occurs in any shape or form at the
material ends of a radiator and all that pertains to such. * *PERIOD

nah, just because i can measure it with my simple tdr here doesn't mean it
happens... its all the magical mystery levitating neutrinos that cause all
the fun.

David
You should know better.
Years ago I pointed out that the extension of the Gaussian law of
static results in Maxwells laws
with extension via mathematics. Before then I am sure that you were
aware of magnostatic fields
so it should not come as a surprize that the mathemetics is well
proven. When the mathematics were presented
before your very eyes you came up with reasons that defy the
imagination and totally absurd
You have the "field and waves" book by Ramo and Co so read it from end
to end with a smidgeon of understanding
so you may follow it from first principles. All the answers you seek
are
written in that book and they agree perfectly with mine. Nowhere does
it confirm what you state that Statics have zero connection
with magnetics which thus prevents mathematical connections. As for
hoop stress that is another derivitation of Newtons laws of action and
reaction and Newtons laws apply to the Universe including
electromagnetics via the Standard Model which, by the way ,includes
the Weak force that you also deny the presence of as well as the
chemical critera.
Your engineering ability is forcing your personal credability into the
ground.
Art

"Art Unwin" wrote in message
...

You should know better.

i do know better than you.

Years ago I pointed out that the extension of the Gaussian law of
static results in Maxwells laws
with extension via mathematics.

absolutely worthless since guass's law was already a part of maxwell's
equations, your 'addition' was worthless.

All the answers you seek are
written in that book and they agree perfectly with mine.

nowhere does it include the weak farce in the maxwell's equations, nor does
it ever mention your magical levitating diamagnetic neutrinos.

On Jan 3, 11:40*am, "Dave" wrote:
"Art Unwin" wrote in message

...

You should know better.

i do know better than you.

Years ago I pointed out that the extension of the Gaussian law of
static results in Maxwells laws
with extension via mathematics.

absolutely worthless since guass's law was already a part of maxwell's
equations, your 'addition' was worthless.

Oh My! The Gaussian law included was NOT the law of statics
What sort of school did you attend?





All the answers you seek are
written in that book and they agree perfectly with mine.


nowhere does it include the weak farce in the maxwell's equations, nor does
it ever mention your magical levitating diamagnetic neutrinos.

That is only because it is not fully up to date just like many other
technical
books including Terman

The World has spent millions of dollars on the C.E.R.N. project in
Switzerland
to investigate neutrious, the weak force and the Higgs field.
They have a home page on the net why not take a moment to read it so
that you will become up to date?
Art

"Art Unwin" wrote in message
...
Oh My! The Gaussian law included was NOT the law of statics
What sort of school did you attend?

there is only one gauss's law that is included in maxwell's equations,
please state your equation so i may poke more holes in it.