On Jan 11, 11:28*am, "Dave" wrote:
* "Art Unwin" wrote in ...
* On Jan 11, 8:40 am, "Dave" wrote:
* "Richard Fry" wrote in
...
* On Jan 10, 6:59 pm, Art Unwin wrote:
*
* I gave the reasons for my line of thinking having gone thru the
* routine of reading and accepting what the books say. You
* spurned my statement giving no reason why it should not be
* accepted.
*
* Not so, Art.
*
* The simplest reason that you should abandon your line of thinking
* about there being no current reflection from the unterminated end
* along the outside of all radiators is that such beliefs were proven
* invalid by the measured results of Gihring and Brown over 70 years ago
* -- as shown in the excerpt of their IRE paper which has been linked to
* twice, now.
*
* RF
*
* the more it gets quoted the more he will consider it lemming talk and
reject
* it. art is in his own little world now, full of magical levitating
* diamagnetic neutrinos and burrowing anti-eddy currents up the middle of
* conductors... of course, where those currents go when they reach the
* feedpoint would be an interesting thing to hear, maybe art can comment
on
* that for a while... they probably just jump up to the surface again and
go
* around in circles.

* Pull your dress down your slip is showing

so you can't even come up with another technical comeback? *just got to
stoop all the way down to a cheap personal attack. *I guess this thread is
over then since you have run out of fun things to say.

No,No,Noi There is no evidence that you have a yearning for the
backsides of man
it is just a play on words which point to your error in thinking. ala
the slip. Get it?
I have made no attempt to hide my thinking with a torrent of words
under the guise of shakespeare
to provide cover
I provided a single liner. No more, no less