Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Jim-NN7K wrote:
One thing further- IF you check, you will see that the Physical Size of a BNC (minus the connector locking outer ring) is the same size as the N fitting! The "N" male will plug into a "BNC" female,the BNC without its locking ring will plug into an "N"female! There are temporary connectors to take advantage of this factor, for testing (not permanent) connectors ! As info, Jim NN7K I knew that. I have a home-made pair that I use from time-to-time in the lab. |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article , ml
wrote: The other thing i pondered is that it seems the don't make Pl259/so239 connectors for hardline, so what do guys use typically for higher power DIN? ML- I would expect hardline manufacturers to use a standard connector intended for the power and frequency involved, but designed to fit the end of their cable. When hardline is chosen because of low loss rather than needing high power, it is often used for long runs with a short flexible cable at the end to connect to equipment. In this application, use of type N connectors is common, with a female connector custom made to fit the hardline. You can get adapters for PL259/SO239, but those are lousy connectors for RF. Their impedance is not constant from one end to the other! Fred K4DII |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jan 10, 10:29*pm, Fred McKenzie wrote:
In article , ml wrote: The other * thing *i pondered * is that it seems * *the don't *make * Pl259/so239 connectors for hardline, *so what do guys use *typically for * higher *power * DIN? ML- I would expect hardline manufacturers to use a standard connector intended for the power and frequency involved, but designed to fit the end of their cable. When hardline is chosen because of low loss rather than needing high power, it is often used for long runs with a short flexible cable at the end to connect to equipment. *In this application, use of type N connectors is common, with a female connector custom made to fit the hardline. You can get adapters for PL259/SO239, but those are lousy connectors for RF. *Their impedance is not constant from one end to the other! Fred K4DII What I use on 7/8 hardline is a copper reducer with a barrel connecter soldered into one end and then I screw the combination over the hard line. Now you have an output from the hardline that can fit most things . One time I filled the copper reducer with dielectric before I inserted the barrel connecter but could see no difference using max power. Certainly a lot cheaper than Andrews connectors and if the coax route is not ideal it is easy and inexpensive to add flexible lengths at tight corners, such as emerging from underground piping. Hardline gets extremely rigid and the outer insulation is subject to cracking in the winter time which is when I seem to have to work on things. Art |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Art Unwin" wrote in message
... "What I use on 7/8 hardline is a copper reducer with a barrel connecter soldered into one end and then I screw the combination over the hard line. Now you have an output from the hardline that can fit most things . One time I filled the copper reducer with dielectric before I inserted the barrel connecter but could see no difference using max power. Certainly a lot cheaper than Andrews connectors and if the coax route is not ideal it is easy and inexpensive to add flexible lengths at tight corners, such as emerging from underground piping. Hardline gets extremely rigid and the outer insulation is subject to cracking in the winter time which is when I seem to have to work on things." Just remember that the aluminum to copper galvanic couple promotes the corrosion of the aluminum. Keep the contact areas as dry as possible if you don't want problems. I have found that wrapping several layers of tightly stretched vinyl electrical tape and then spraying the area with clear Krylon® acrylic varnish does a reasonable job. But since water vapor can diffuse through the tape, you will need to check the connection periodically. 73, Dr. Barry L. Ornitz WA4VZQ |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jan 11, 1:59*pm, "NoSPAM" wrote:
"Art Unwin" wrote in message ... "What I use on 7/8 hardline is a copper reducer with a barrel connecter soldered into one end and then I screw the combination over the hard line.. Now you have an output from the hardline that can fit most things . One time I filled the copper reducer with dielectric before I inserted the barrel connecter but could see no difference *using max power. *Certainly a lot cheaper than Andrews connectors and if the coax route is not ideal it is easy and inexpensive to add flexible lengths at tight corners, such as emerging from underground piping. Hardline gets extremely rigid and the outer insulation is subject to cracking in the winter time which is when I seem to have to work on things." Just remember that the aluminum to copper galvanic couple promotes the corrosion of the aluminum. *Keep the contact areas as dry as possible if you don't want problems. *I have found that wrapping several layers of tightly stretched vinyl electrical tape and then spraying the area with clear Krylon® acrylic varnish does a reasonable job. *But since water vapor can diffuse through the tape, you will need to check the connection periodically. * * 73, *Dr. Barry L. Ornitz *WA4VZQ All true Then copper reducer matched the copper outside of the Andrews hardline that I use and it made its own thread as I screwed it on. I don't believe I soldered that end like I did with the barrel input tho I often apply a liberal spray of acrylic on those sort of aplications to prevent the inside copper from going green not that I have seen that sort of evidence The use of this type of connection at points of sharp turns on the 1/2 acre available for the tower away from the residence really works out inexpensive compared to the Andrews connectors when connecting to short lengths of Andrews 1/2 flexible coax. When tussling with long heavy hardline in the winter it invariably crackes or splits the plastic outer covering exposing the corregated copper sheathing, so if it has to be moved or replaced it is better if it is without bends of any sort, I have a long stretch in an underground pipe which is easily removed as it is without kinks.As far as the tape goes I find that the 3M professional roles become subject to perishing so I don't use it any more tho I have plenty of rolls on hand Regards Art |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
NoSPAM wrote:
"Art Unwin" wrote in message ... "What I use on 7/8 hardline is a copper reducer with a barrel connecter soldered into one end and then I screw the combination over the hard line. Now you have an output from the hardline that can fit most things . One time I filled the copper reducer with dielectric before I inserted the barrel connecter but could see no difference using max power. Certainly a lot cheaper than Andrews connectors and if the coax route is not ideal it is easy and inexpensive to add flexible lengths at tight corners, such as emerging from underground piping. Hardline gets extremely rigid and the outer insulation is subject to cracking in the winter time which is when I seem to have to work on things." Just remember that the aluminum to copper galvanic couple promotes the corrosion of the aluminum. Keep the contact areas as dry as possible if you don't want problems. I have found that wrapping several layers of tightly stretched vinyl electrical tape and then spraying the area with clear Krylon® acrylic varnish does a reasonable job. But since water vapor can diffuse through the tape, you will need to check the connection periodically. 73, Dr. Barry L. Ornitz WA4VZQ Use an elbow to get tight 90s. http://www.eaa1000.av.org/technicl/c...n/galvanic.htm |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Dave" wrote in message
... NoSPAM wrote: "Art Unwin" wrote in message ... "What I use on 7/8 hardline is a copper reducer with a barrel connecter soldered into one end and then I screw the combination over the hard line. Now you have an output from the hardline that can fit most things . One time I filled the copper reducer with dielectric before I inserted the barrel connecter but could see no difference using max power. Certainly a lot cheaper than Andrews connectors and if the coax route is not ideal it is easy and inexpensive to add flexible lengths at tight corners, such as emerging from underground piping. Hardline gets extremely rigid and the outer insulation is subject to cracking in the winter time which is when I seem to have to work on things." Just to clarify things, the above part is from Art. The following is mine. Just remember that the aluminum to copper galvanic couple promotes the corrosion of the aluminum. Keep the contact areas as dry as possible if you don't want problems. I have found that wrapping several layers of tightly stretched vinyl electrical tape and then spraying the area with clear Krylon® acrylic varnish does a reasonable job. But since water vapor can diffuse through the tape, you will need to check the connection periodically. 73, Dr. Barry L. Ornitz WA4VZQ Use an elbow to get tight 90s. http://www.eaa1000.av.org/technicl/c...n/galvanic.htm This is a good list because it covers many grades of aluminum and stainless steel (but unfortunately not the 308 stainless alloy often used in wire and nuts, bolts, and washers found in hardware stores). I wish it listed the actual voltages referenced to a standard electrode however. Galvanic couples of less than a tenth of a volt corrode very slowly and are often acceptable depending on the application. I have found the following article useful. http://www.ocean.udel.edu/seagrant/p...corrosion.html Also I would like to add that the Krylon sprayed over the vinyl tape is very important. Being an acrylic, clear Krylon protects the vinyl from ultraviolet damage. 73, Barry WA4VZQ |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
I see the center pin on a typical N connector is pretty small
How much power could it hold at HF and also uhf/vhf frequencies? Assuming a modern day high quality N connector?? The power handling capability of a connector is determined by both its voltage limit and its current limit, whichever of the two is more constraining. The N connector voltage limit is usually stated to be 500V (peak), corresponding to an RF power of 2,500W over 50-Ohm impedance. Please note that the 500V limit applies to the extreme environmental and conditions (e.g. temperature, humidity) so, for a normal usage, the connector would well withstand more than 500V. Conversely, I was never able to find a specification for the N connector current limit. This will actually depend on the usage conditions, i.e. whether a round.the-clock broadcast service, or an intermittent amateur service. With a power of 2,500W, the rms current through the connector would be about 7A (at 50 Ohm), a value that, given the size of the inner pin, I would consider well tolerable for amateur service. For a broadcast service instead it would perhaps be safe not to exceed 1,000W at VHF, or somewhat less at UHF. The other thing i pondered is that it seems the don't make Pl259/so239 connectors for hardline, so what do guys use typically for higher power DIN? The PL259 connectors are low-cost connectors that are simply unknown in the professional world. Main reasons a - they do not offer a controlled impedance across the connector length - they are not sealed, and hence offering no protection against humidity - the ground connection is unsafe. If the connector does not remain well tigthened under all operational conditions, one can never be sure on the continuity of the ground path. For hardlines there is a good choice of connectors, see http://www.surplussales.com/connectors /HardLConnIndex.html 73 Tony I0JX |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Without actually researching it I suspect the power handling capacity
will be similar to the 1/2" line itself. When a N plug mates with a N socket it presents the same Z as the line with pretty well the same diameters. ie the small pin is not carrying the whole load. The RF losses and subsequent heating will be a function of skin effect of course. How well the pin is soldered will probably also make a small difference. Arcover will be an interesting discussion though as there is an air dielectric where the pieces join.. I guess you could work it out from known resistance of metals, allowing for skin effect and what will happen first, arcing or melting - all at 50 ohms and a bit of ohms law. Lets face it though you can go and look at manufacturers websites for this kind of info. Hardline of larger diameters than an N connector use DIN connectors or anything else that is "larger". If you are really wanting to know go and have a look at something like the andrew website for data. You can of course also reduce to N size using a suitable fitting. Cheers Bob VK2YQA ml wrote: hi Just wondering a few things |
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Bob Bob wrote:
Without actually researching it I suspect the power handling capacity will be similar to the 1/2" line itself. When a N plug mates with a N socket it presents the same Z as the line with pretty well the same diameters. ie the small pin is not carrying the whole load. The little pin is only a mating guide for a much larger center conductor. I like 7/8" "Heliax". EIA connectors. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
TCS power connector | Boatanchors | |||
Dummy load power rating | Antenna | |||
WTB: Power connector for BC 260 | Swap | |||
FA: New BC-348 Power Connector | Boatanchors | |||
FRG-100 What power connector ? | Homebrew |