Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Peter,
I have heard that vertical antennas are more susceptible to noise! I live in a residential area with a moderate amount of man-made QRN. My antenna "farm" (which is more of a small garden ;-) includes horizontal dipoles for 80 and 160 meters, and verticals on 40, 80 and 160. Using a remote antenna switch, I can quickly select antenna orientation and easily compare signal strength and QRN levels. For signal strength, the horizontals are superior under 500 miles, but after that the verticals kick in and are almost-always better at DX distances. In fact, even IF the signal strength of DX stations were equal on both, the fact that the verticals attenuate the local stations by over 20db is enough of a selling point. For QRN, I think the answer is like real estate: location, location, location. My verticals are at the rear of the property and farthest away from power lines and AC service to the house. The dipoles extend into the front yard and are more susceptible to AC line noise. Although I also expected the verticals to be "noisier", due to locations the dipoles are a little - but barely - noisier than the verticals. Hope this explanation helps, -- -larry K8UT "Peter" wrote in message . au... I'm proposing to build a new multi-band HF antenna. Previously I used simple relatively low (8mtr) dipole (28mtr total length) feed with ladder line and matched with a Z-Match tuner. Worked ok, but was useless for DX. My proposed antenna is to be vertical (7mtr radiator) to be used on bands from 10mtr to 30mtr. I have heard that vertical antennas are more susceptible to noise! I'm keen to hear this groups view on the noise issue and generally how verticals are regarded as a DX antenna. Also keen to hear of personal experiences with vertical antennas on HF. Regards Peter http://members.optushome.com.au/vk6ysf/vk6ysf/main.htm |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Larry Gauthier (K8UT) wrote:
My verticals are at the rear of the property and farthest away from power lines and AC service to the house. The dipoles extend into the front yard and are more susceptible to AC line noise. Although I also expected the verticals to be "noisier", due to locations the dipoles are a little - but barely - noisier than the verticals. It certainly depends upon location. At my previous QTH, the horizontal dipole was, on the average, 2 S-units quieter than the 40m vertical. I tracked the noise to a 30 foot ground wire running down a power pole. -- 73, Cecil http://www.w5dxp.com |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Cecil Moore" wrote in message ... Larry Gauthier (K8UT) wrote: My verticals are at the rear of the property and farthest away from power lines and AC service to the house. The dipoles extend into the front yard and are more susceptible to AC line noise. Although I also expected the verticals to be "noisier", due to locations the dipoles are a little - but barely - noisier than the verticals. It certainly depends upon location. At my previous QTH, the horizontal dipole was, on the average, 2 S-units quieter than the 40m vertical. I tracked the noise to a 30 foot ground wire running down a power pole. -- 73, Cecil http://www.w5dxp.com Thanks for the comments, which confirms most of what beleive was the case. The QTH is Northam in Western Australia, about 80km east from Perth. All other major population centres are DX. The nearest distribution transformer is about 250metre away as is the 22kV HV feeder with only 240/415V low voltage in my street, therefore noise should be low from this source. The only thing to do is build it see! Cheers -- Peter VK6YSF |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Cecil,
Please tell me any more information you may have about the ground wire running down the power pole. I did the exact same thing here. I found most of my noise was being generated by this ground wire 3 blocks from my house. Were you able to do anything about it? Michael Cecil Moore wrote: Larry Gauthier (K8UT) wrote: My verticals are at the rear of the property and farthest away from power lines and AC service to the house. The dipoles extend into the front yard and are more susceptible to AC line noise. Although I also expected the verticals to be "noisier", due to locations the dipoles are a little - but barely - noisier than the verticals. It certainly depends upon location. At my previous QTH, the horizontal dipole was, on the average, 2 S-units quieter than the 40m vertical. I tracked the noise to a 30 foot ground wire running down a power pole. |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jan 13, 11:12*am, Michael wrote:
It certainly depends upon location. At my previous QTH, the horizontal dipole was, on the average, 2 S-units quieter than the 40m vertical. I tracked the noise to a 30 foot ground wire running down a power pole. I would think that means a bad connection somewhere near that point. Could be the wire connection to ground itself, or a bad part somewhere near that area, and the ground wire was just acting as an antenna extension to the bad part. Many parts can develop bad or leaky connections and start to cause noise. It was a bad end connector once when I had to call the power co. Make sure the ground wire is actually connected to ground well, and if it still makes noise, try banging the power pole with a sledgehammer while listening on a portable radio. If the noise changes, it's fairly close in that area. Or if you use a radio with a directional antenna, you might be able to get fairly close. Once you get that close, nothing to do except bug the power company. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
The Long and Thin Vertical Loop Antenna. [ The Non-Resonance Vertical with a Difference ] | Shortwave | |||
FS DX-88 vertical antenna | Swap | |||
FS HF Vertical Antenna | Swap | |||
Vertical HF antenna | Antenna | |||
WTB: HF Vertical Antenna in PBC, Fl | Swap |